Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 51
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 45 | ← | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | → | Archive 55 |
ConvertSpecs
it is just simple description of the special kind of eye glasses -Utillia (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Note: Article has been deleted twice, both times as G11. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 01:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Not done. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind. An encyclopedia article needs to be written without promotional phrases like "The latest american innovation... without a need to spend fortune in prescription glasses... significantly improve the life quality... ", and to show notability by giving references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
is an important annual event for the exchange of knowledge in the field of library and information science recognized not only in Europe but also worldwide. Although advertised as a conference from students for students it has the backing of the European Association for Library and Information Education and Research and professionals do present and take part in the exchange of knowledge with new generation of library and information science professionals. -141.20.192.122 (talk) 10:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Done LadyofShalott 10:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)- (NB: it has been restored as a contested PROD ... it may still be nominated for deletion unless the problems noted in the PROD are addressed quickly) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Shatavadhani R Ganesh
OTRS permission received in ticket 2011092710004837 for content that was at this page, taken from here, under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL licenses. -– Adrignola talk 14:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done but incubated. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Argo Group
reasoning -Medeia (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Admin,
I am currently doing my internship and I am trying to place an article on Argo Group Int., which is an insurance company. The reason is not advertising, but to have the company itself listed on this online Encyclopedia which contains information about almost everything. I have also seen many others companies and their profile, such as one of the biggest companies Axa profile as well. I limited the description in order to avoid advertisement, and if it will be deleted again, could anyone tell me why? Or what should I write, how should I write it? My source was linked as well.. Im looking forward to hearing from you, Thank you a lot for your help,
Orsi Balog
The Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. is an American Insurance Group operating globally with offices in South America- Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo- Western Europe –London, Brussels, Paris, Zurich- and the Middle East-Dubai. It was founded in 1986, Headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
The Argo group of companies are engaged in underwriting Specialty Insurances and Reinsurance Products.
The Argo Group encompasses four business segments: Excess & Surplus Lines, Commercial Specialty, Reinsurance and International Specialty.
(The company Excess and Surplus Lines segment underwrites casualty, property, transportation, and binding authority for commercial enterprises. Its Commercial Specialty segment offers property casualty and surety coverages; and underwrites business coverage for small commercial businesses.)[1]finance.yh
- Page was last deleted as a G11; before that it was a A7. Please read Wikipedia:Corporations and the Community and WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not done as per above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Zuzana Tlučková
I want to improve the article if undeleted.In addition to that,I'll put in as uch reliable sources as possible and improve the top.Not to be biased. -IanRootBeerDubber (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think there was enough there to really be of use to you. All you'd written before was an infobox, and most of the article text was calling the template rather than filling out its parameters. If you want to write a better version, go ahead, you don't need any permission here. Cheers. lifebaka++ 22:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not done as above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
A Broom With A View
I am requesting assistance in being able to communicate with the editor(s) who removed three of my pages (listed below). I am a fairly new author and am still learning proper Wiki protocol.
RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "A Broom With A View (album)" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)
RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Arachnitect (album)" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/node/11)
RE: 14:22, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Vampire Empire (album)" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)
I would like to be able to restore the three pages that were deleted, supposedly for copyright infringement (not sure what the unambiguous means).
I was not contacted about the removal, and just happened upon it tonight when I tried to enter on and update them. I was not given a chance to make any adjustments, defend, or understand the reasoning for the removal. I thought that I had followed formats from other artist album pages.
The graphics for the albums were cleared through wikimedia ahead of time, and the material used was referenced and verifiable. I will be happy to modify the text or, if there is any need for to obtain copyright permission from the artist, Kristen Lawrence, to satisfy any copyright questions. Please let me know what I need to do.
Thank you for your assistance. -Idaho50 (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Note that admins will not restore copyright infringements. See WP:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:10, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not done as above - user has submitted a later request with different reasoning (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Ontario tourist route logos
deleted without warning, should have already been tagged with 'too simple for copyright' -ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 01:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
deleted without warning, should have already been tagged with 'too simple for copyright' -ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 01:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Both of these have already been restored by the deleting admin. lifebaka++ 18:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done as above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Emma Rayne Lyle
- (extended draft article removed - it duplicated this version submitted to AfC. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC))
- I have created a new article for Emma Rayne Lyle but it did not take: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Emma_Rayne_Lyle#Emma_Rayne_Lyle -- 75.192.87.28 (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- I followed the instructions from the administrator who told me to rewrite the article. You may find the link to the discussions for the article creation here: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Emma_Rayne_Lyle#References and the original article Emma Rayne Lyle and its discussion Talk:Emma_Rayne_Lyle
- Emma Rayne Lyle is listed as an actress in two films on Wikipedia and her name is the only one that redirects to a deleted page. It doesn't look professional on her part. I Don't know How She Does It and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_%282011_film%29
- 75.243.141.6 (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Merged duplicate sections below into this. lifebaka++ 05:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not 100% sure that Lyle meets WP:ENTERTAINER, but certainly the above (which is the proposed article) in no way meets A7. I'll move the AfC to article space and clean it up a bit. Cheers. lifebaka++ 05:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done as above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Songcat:/B.Hall (really should be called Barbara Hall
advertising -Songcat (talk) 19:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and restored your userpage, as well as moved it to a subpage at User:Songcat/Barbara Hall so you can continue to work on it. Please be aware that if you move the page into the mainspace (where articles are) without fixing the advertising issues noted by the tagger and deleting admin, it is extremely likely to be deleted again. In addition, please be aware that userspace is not an indefinite holding ground for previously deleted articles; if you do not edit this page in several months, it may be deleted again. Cheers. lifebaka++ 22:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done userfied as above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Songcat: B. Hall Sandbox
see below -Songcat (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Please call it B. Hall. Songcat is my username. She is a cartoonist and artist of some repute: see The Great Women Cartoonists by Trina Robbins (Workman, 2008). Also Barbara Hall (as she is also known) is mentioned in Lambiek's Comicopedia (http://lambiek.net/artists/). She is the co-founder of Quarry Hill Creative Center which has its own Wikipedia page. I can't figure out all the complexities of Wikipedia these days. Any help you can give me would be great. Thanks, Isabella F. McFarlin daughter of Barbara Hall Fiske -- though she deserves this listing, not because she's my mother but because she is a person of some remarkable quality and has some renown. Thanks! I.
- I'm fairly sure that I've already put this at User:Songcat/Barbara Hall for you. Just click that link to find it, and work on it there. Cheers. lifebaka++ 08:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - duplicate entry (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Vampire Empire (album)
Have Proper Copyright Permission -Idaho50 (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
In reviewing the reasons for deletion of the three music albums, I would like to have the pages restored for the following reasons: I followed formats from other artist album pages, cited sources that are verifiable, and used Wikimedia photos. Everything on the pages was given WITH PERMISSION from the Artist, with NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
Please let me know what I need to do to resolve this issue. If a copy of the original pages could be made available to me, I would be happy to work to reassure editors of my following proper procedures, or modify them, if needed.
The three deleted pages are: RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "A Broom With A View (album)" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)
RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Arachnitect (album)" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/node/11)
RE: 14:22, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Vampire Empire (album)" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)
- Copyright permission would need to be sent to WP:OTRS, because the author really needs to understand the licencing. These articles would have to be mercilessly edited in userspace before they could become live articles. WP:PUFFERY like "...a saucy invitation..." has to go, point blank. Youtube, facebook, myspace are neither valid references nor external links. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not done as above - I'm trying to guide the editor a little better with how to proceed (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:27, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Marc Ecko
reasoning -207.237.16.167 (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Page isn't deleted. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- It was until about 5 minutes ago. I was about to message the deleting admin about this when it was restored by zscout370. I would have declined this speedy and trouted the tagger for not using a descriptive edit summary. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- He created a major urban-lifestyle clothing line. I seen Ecko in high school and I left that in 2004. Sure the article is not the best, but he is way above just a simple CSD. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- It was until about 5 minutes ago. I was about to message the deleting admin about this when it was restored by zscout370. I would have declined this speedy and trouted the tagger for not using a descriptive edit summary. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done as above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:28, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Timothy Ray West
arbitrary decision wrong -Timwest1156 (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
First, this article was done to facilitate the adding of Mr. West to the list of actors
from Kansas, which is a fact. He has acted, in a speaking role in a movie about Autism
called "The Sunset Sky". It is documented on the Internet Movie Database, and a few
other sites. I have found no criteria stating he had to have acted in more than one film
or show to qualify. It would seem that the rules on here leave a very wide area for
interpretation. I submit that if this wide latitude in deleting is going to be used then it
should also be used for allowing what some may consider questionable additions, unless
an administrator has definite evidence to the contrary of what is being posted. This
instance is not even close since evidence was provided as requested.
The movie shows some of the troubles people with Autism and their relatives deal with and how they overcome them. It is not a documentary or Biographical film but it does depict some of the actual issues they have.
I originally tried to just add the name “Timothy Ray West” to the Kansas Actors List but was informed an article was needed. So I made one and it was “Speedy Deleted”.
Anyway, there is no reason for this page to not be posted.
Thank you!
- Note: Article was deleted as an A7. Requesting user's name implies he either is, or is affiliated with, the subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Maria Steley
The article was probably deleted because an admin didn't know who Maria Steley was and why she should be in the encyclopaedia. Maria Steley is a person who came to Australia and wrote a diary. The diary is in the Queensland Archives. Google her name to learn more. Also, I am in no way related to Maria Steley. :) -Jji7skyline (talk) 07:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Skier Dude (talk)
- Here is a link that may clarify things a bit — http://enc.slq.qld.gov.au/vbook/slq/steley/index.htm
Weavers Way Co-op
As a dynamic organization with over 5,000 members, a strong urban farming program, an educational arm and a newspaper with a circulation of over 23,000, Weavers Way is the largest co-op in Philadelphia, and I think a relevant institution. -Jonmcgo (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The entry was deleted because it had not been updated in several years and was undersourced, although much (but not all) of the content seemed to have come from the website, and consisted of material written primarily by me. Now that I have an account, I will make sure the entry is sourced and updated. Thank you.
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 23:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
File:060528_snakehill.png
I am the creator of this image, which was deleted for lack of clear copyright status. I will update its description page appropriately.. -Massachusetts (talk) 23:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done It appears the issue was not the license, but the source - see the page history for further details. Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
File:TVXQ in Paris France cropped.JPG
TVXQ does not currently hold 5 members of the band, but two. This image is old, and inappropriate for current situation, i strongly recommend it to be either changed or just have TVXQ name on it -Homindbsk (talk) 01:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done The image is on Wiki Commons, so discussion about the image itself belongs there; however, you can begin a discussion at Talk:TVXQ about this. Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Sage City Symphony
reasoning -Cemmur (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
The page that was deleted is for an organization that is a community orchestra of significant import in the region, and has at least the following cross references in other Wikipedia entries. I put the start of it up to have a framework to add content over the next few days. We are NOT a for profit organization - we are a not for profit organization that premieres new works each year and has featured a variety of composers as can be seen at our web site (http://www.sagecitysymphony/other_grps.cfm).
Louis Calabro org Sage City Symphony in 1973, an ambitious community orchestra in southwestern Vermont which is still active. He believed strongly in ... 11 KB (1,737 words) - 20:05, 2 June 2011 Marta Ptaszynska Concerto for Percussion Quartet and Orchestra | (1974) | October 10, 1974 | Sage City Symphony Orchestra , Bennington, Vermont | Louis ... 15 KB (1,898 words) - 14:08, 15 September 2011 Susan Hurley (composer) Commissions : Sage City Symphony, Bennington, VT http://www. bennington. edu/curric_SageCitySymph. asp SCS reference. The New Calliope Singers, ... 6 KB (791 words) - 02:36, 20 September 2011vtr
Celia Murray (webmaster and player)
- Not done as there was not enough there to meet minimum standards, but I have "userfied" it for you to User:Cemmur/Sage City Symphony where you can develop it. Note that being non-profit is not a free pass: you still need to demonstrate notability by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, as you are connected with the orchestra, you have from Wikipedia's point of view a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, so you should not post the article yourself but submit it at WP:Articles for creation, declaring your interest, and let uninvolved users decide. Take care to avoid a promotional tone. There is good advice at WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Sainte Jeanne d'Arc de nuit-large.jpg
- File:Sainte Jeanne d'Arc de nuit-large.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This is a former featured picture on the English Wikipedia that was deleted as being transferred to Commons. However, a deletion request at Commons determined that it (along with other files) should be sent back to the local wiki as fair use, as it had improper licensing for Commons. The file description page on the English Wikipedia still exists with just the former featured picture and picture of the day templates, but the file itself needs to be restored. -Logan Talk Contributions 15:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Can I leave you to sort out fair-use tagging? JohnCD (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I restored the previous licensing for now, but I'm probably going to PUF it and figure out whether or not it needs a fair use rationale/should be completely deleted. Logan Talk Contributions 15:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Lark Play Development Center
This article appears to have been deleted either in error, or as part of a histmerge that was not completed, please restore it. It was Deleted G6 "Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: \". Deleting admin has not responded to my attempts to contact them. (They have responded to other messages on their talk page but ignored mine, the person who tagged the page for a hist merge also left a message and did not get a response). I know of no good reason why this article should be deleted, if it was going to be histmerged it would have been undeleted by now. Please also restore Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lark Play Development Center and Talk:Lark Play Development Center both deleted G8 after the primary page. -Monty845 22:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- With no comment on the deletion, I was not given adequate time to respond to the above-mentioned query before an undeletion request was filed. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Hockenheimring
reasoning -217.43.182.237 (talk) 23:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
I added Tony Boden to the fatal accident section of hockenheimring, this has been deleted. Tony Boden sustained 70% 3rd degre burns after an accident at a drag racing event, the first to be held at hockenheim on 9th august 1986, he was airlifted to hospital in Ludwigshafen at died from his injuries on 16/08/86. this should not have been deleted, it is a fact and can be verified.
- Not done The article has not been deleted. You added an entry that was not accepted by WP:CONSENSUS. You may discuss the proposed addition on the article's talkpage (as per WP:BRD), and perhaps you can make you case - if supported by reliable sources for its addition there. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Raymond A. Watson
Undeleting the article has been discussed and consensus seems to be in favor of relisting it, but relisting has not been accompllished. Thank you. -GeorgeLouis (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done DRV is still in progress for this article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Comment - this needs an admin to close the DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 September 21. I will look at it tomorrow, if nobody else gets there first. JohnCD (talk) 11:54, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Courcelles closed the DRV as "restore and relist" - new AfD here. JohnCD (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Nicha Lertpitaksinchai
she whon at leat 1 ITF 25K level title which makes her notable according to: Wikipedia:NTENNIS#Tennis -Gabinho>:) 16:42, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done, here is the entire content of the deleted page:
- Nicha Lertpitaksinchai is a Thai tennis player.
- GB fan 18:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Jan Rogers Kniffen
reasoning -KLM3618 (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 17:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Narwhalions
because the religion is real even though not many people are followers. -Lady Lucinda Grand Duchess of Evil (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. GB fan 18:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Under the Elephant
The subject of the article is inherently notable because it was founded by notable members of the music industry. In addition, after notifications that improper references were used, these references were replaced. It appears that this fact was not considered before deletion of the page. -98.225.251.136 (talk) 00:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Article was deleted as an A7. Also, Notability isn't inheritable. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 01:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Andy Scott Harris
Reason for deletion: G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. I would like to point out that the deleted page is NOT substantially identical to the prior deleted versions, and has been improved by the addition of references, copyrights and new notability. An administrator deleted this page without obtaining consensus to delete it, and without prior warning to the editor. Wikipedia policy states that if a page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion. The page has been improved and should not be deleted. The person now meets the notability criteria of having received a well-known and significant award, a Young Artist Award, and has also been nominated for this award several times. The Young Artist Awards has multiple Wikipedia articles in which the person is mentioned. As an entertainer, the person has had additional significant roles in productions since the original article was deleted. The person has starred in a movie, The Boarder, which is about a topic unusual enough to deserve attention, Reactive Attachment Disorder. The movie is based on a published book by an expert in the field of Reactive Attachment Disorder and has a Wikipedia article in which the person is mentioned. I respectfully ask that the deleted content be emailed to me, so the content can be further improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace. -Susanahornil (talk) 04:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done, but rather than email I have "userfied" it for you to User:Susanahornil/Andy Scott Harris, in order to preserve the edit history. At the top of the userfied page is a link to move it back into the main encyclopedia, but please do not do that without permission: when you are ready, you should first approach user Jayjg (talk), the admin who closed the deletion debate: if Jayjg does not agree, you can make a request at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Federation of Free States of Africa
Deleted by vandalists against the organization -Opalsun (talk) 00:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Of the three deletions, the most recent one is a G3 but the other two are A7s. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 01:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done. No, the first two versions were deleted (last February) because they did not explain why the organization was important or significant - they were sourced only to its own website, but an article needs to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The third version was just vandalism - a personal attack. JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Suzy Haner
The person whom this article was listed after is related to Synyster Gates from Avenged Sevenfold and Brian Haner, Sr. She's worked with Susan Egan, produces and directs music videos, works on many projects with the likes of Jeff Dunham, Susan Egan AND Avenged Sevenfold as well. She is a comedian and hypnotist in her own right working in the California State Fair and Magic Mountain in Southern California. -Gigiplague (talk) 04:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done. The article deleted in 2006 is not worth restoring - it was a single sentence that said only that she was the wife of someone and the mother of someone else. Notability is not inherited, but if you can show that she is notable in her own right, you are welcome to write an article about her. Advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
zFTPServer
Product still active, active development is ongoing. -46.59.76.31 (talk) 08:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Should I assume you really mean ZFTPServer Suite? The one you noted was only a redirect (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
PilotsEYE.tv
This page has been deleted because advertising was supposed to run for it! As a editor of this article I would like this to say that it's not been my intention, or is. My argument is: because it would allegedly only advertising, although it is not on Wikipedia an objective representation seen as advertising.
Above site is categorized in the genre of aviation videos. There are also objective article but for movies like: Die Hard! also accepted. PilotsEYE.tv can be found on the German Wikipedia. -The Seraph 
(DISCU/EDITS/MAIL) 13:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Page was deleted as a G11. Also, please note that whatever passes for acceptable on de.wikipedia does not necessarily meet en.wikipedia's standards, and vice versa. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 13:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- It is and was not my intention to run advertising for PilotsEYE.tv to create a purely informative Wikipedia page that describes the PilotsEYE.tv. I found the article quite by objective!--The Seraph
(DISCU/EDITS/MAIL) 13:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- It is and was not my intention to run advertising for PilotsEYE.tv to create a purely informative Wikipedia page that describes the PilotsEYE.tv. I found the article quite by objective!--The Seraph
Roxen_(web_server)
Our organization still uses the Roxen Content Management System, powered by Roxen Web Server, as do many others (just not that many in the US) -Michael Muzzie 15:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ... however, the article has now been nominated for deletion here (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Interaction between fiscal and monetary policies
Since monetary policies and fiscal policies are discussed in isolation of their interaction with each other and understanding their interaction is important to analyse their aggregate impact on the economy, the topic is worthy of discussion. Also, lot of studies have been made so far on this subject. A few research papers that could be quoted are : *The Interaction of fiscal and monetary policies by Anton Muscatelli et al
- Interaction between fiscal and monetary policy: How monetary conditions affect fiscal consolidation by Rudiger Ahrend et al
- Monetary-Fiscal Policy Interactions and Fiscal Stimulus by Troy Davig et al
- The Interaction between fiscal and monetary policy by Matthew Canzonery et al.
Reardenfrisco (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)}}
- Note: Surely you jest! The article never existed! —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done You created an article that had " ' " for its contents. This sounds, however, like the start of an essay, which may be better off at Wikversity, as opposed to an encyclopedia of knowledge (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)You created an article that consisted only of the single character ' and nearly three hours later nothing had been added to it. Articles that are posted without any content get deleted because we do not like readers of the encyclopedia to find them. You should develop your article in a sandbox and not post it before there is enough content to make clear it is going to be a serious article. (I suspect this user is from the Wikipedia:India Education Program - they seem to have been given a deadline to put in an article, which has led to several empty ones like this, and is a waste of everyone's time). JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: - the empty article was deleted some time ago; it seems this request was made because the student, who now has material for it, was under the impression that he had first to get it undeleted. I have explained to him that he can just write a new one. JohnCD (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Tom Cain picture.jpg
need to add copyright and licensing info -Kathyguerry (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Mass Realty
Is a neutral, non-biased page about a company and its website. It includes features of the website, information that certain pages contain, information about membership to the site, and services that the company can link you to. It does not advertise the company using promotional language/descriptive adjectives. Article was deleted because it was argued to be an advertisement/promotional page. There are no external sources available about the company to use in the resources section. Only source is the company's website. -Kellymolewski (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Page was deleted as a G11. Please read WP:Notability (organizations and companies). —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Jordan_Richter
reasoning -Jordan Richter (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
This is an entry about a living person. Jordan is a professional skateboarder who was featured in one of Spike Jonze early full length productions "Blind Skateboards, Video Days" and who is a subject of an independent documentary, "Wayward Son." He left professional skateboarding when he converted to Islam, but has returned.
You have entries for his former sponsor, Blind Skateboards, and also for most of his team mates on that team. You also have an entry for Video Days. I cited numerous articles written about him in skateboarding publications, and Muslim publications.
- Note: Article was deleted as a G11. Also, the presence and/or absence of Article(s) X can't be used to justify the presence or absence of Article Y. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 00:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done in this case I agree with Jimfbleak that the whole tone was promotional. It is best not to do autobiogarphies are articles here. Wait for someone else to independently notice the value of the topic and write about it. |Then it is less likely to be over hyped. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Scouting New Zealand.svg
not one I was watching, needed for historical section of article -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done please use before orphan time runs out. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Scouts Canada.svg
needed for article, copyrighted advert is in its stead -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done please use before orphan time runs out. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
reasoning -70.42.176.126 (talk) 11:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Surprised that the page was speedily deleted for the reason that the administrator thought it was an advertisement. I wrote the article because I wanted to understand what UAD is and I was surprised that there was not an already existing article on it. The page only discusses the facts and was not written in a promotional way at all. I need to use and understand the UAD specification for my day job (as do hundreds of thousands of appraisers, lenders, mortgage bankers, etc.) but I am not affiliated in any way with UAD and/or the GSEs that created UAD. The page had only the reasoning behind the creation of UAD, basic facts on UAD and links to the official pages. How do you construe that as promotional or advertisement?
- Note: Page was deleted as a G11. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done I agree not promotional at all. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
The Bawdies
please userfy this for me per afd-I'm trying to clean up someone else's article without the deletionists nosing in -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- That was fast, thank you! Can you have a look at the two graphic requests above?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Granville Automatic
article was improperly deleted citing it did not meet criteria for notable bands. However this group does as one member is a former Top 10 finalist on American Idol who was a founding member of the country supergroup Sugarland and has a Top 10 single in Canada (Vanessa Olivarez, who has her own wikipedia), the other member is a winner of the John Lennon songwriting contest and the founder of significant rock band The Swear who also has a wiki page. The band has appeared on PBS Sun Studio Sessions. This band meets several of Wiki's notability criteria: 6.Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles. 9.Has won or placed in a major music competition. 10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. and 12. 12.Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network. -170.140.221.45 (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 17:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Chinook Winds Adventist Academy
The content that the article Chinook Winds Adventist Academy contained was said to be infringed. However the website(http://chinook22.adventistschoolconnect.org/index.php) has given us permission to use the information that they have on their website. We are students/teachers that represent this school, if there is any possible way to allow us to use this information please contact us through the website. Thank you -Cyclones3 (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://chinook22.adventistschoolconnect.org/index.php. We can't take your word for it. In any case, the language is far too promotional for our use here. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
User:WatchmanR1/Rebecca Costa
OTRS permission received from authorized representative in ticket 2011100410012065 for the content at the sources listed on the corresponding talk page under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. -– Adrignola talk 19:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
UML fever
curious as to its content -Gerardw (talk) 02:18, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted as G3 blatant hoax, if it's not against protocol it could be dropped into userspace Gerardw/sandbox or equivalent. Gerardw (talk) 02:18, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done - text of article emailed to you rather than userfied, as it was suspected to contain copyright violations. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Admiral Samuel W. Peake
Hello fine administrators of Wikipedia!
I come to you on wonderful day after overcoming what I view as the most trying and difficult periods of my life thus far. Recently (within the last few months), I was robbed by an armed robber on the streets, and suffered a few moderate stab wounds. However, this is as far as my memory of the events that transpired extends. Alas, my mind will never fully recall the events and beauties that my mind witnessed in the period of time that I no longer can recall. So now, after what may seem to be much overstated preamble, I come to the point. The article in question was written, by me, shortly before these incidents occurred during a time of great joy in my life. I feel that if I was provided with a copy of this "lost" article, I could review it and perhaps jog my memory as to recall the joyous moments that I have lost. I do not necessarily wish for this article to be posted onto your website again, simply for a copy of the text within the article. I fully understand and support your opinions on its deletion and will similarly support your opinions on whether or not I should receive a copy of the article.
I thank you for your time and hope that you can understand my point of view. -HyundaifOu (talk) 05:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Of the article's three deletions, the first is a G1 and the other two are G3s. Further, this's your only edit and you were created two and a half hours ago. I'm calling shenanigans on this one and will be in touch with a CheckUser. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- The G1 was not the right tag to use, they were all the same blatant hoax. If you can say who the author was perhaps you can get an email copy. It is totally unsuitable for Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- According to a CU HyundaifOu is a sockpuppet of the article's creator. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- The G1 was not the right tag to use, they were all the same blatant hoax. If you can say who the author was perhaps you can get an email copy. It is totally unsuitable for Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
kuramo foundation
i believe this article is not advertising. the article speaks from a third party point of view. if anything, please i want the article back on my userspace. the article was deleted for being advertising under the G11 category -Chuksemeka (talk) 11:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Question: You have made this same request on the nominator and deleting admin talkpages less than a half-hour ago, and have yet to even give them the decency to respond? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)- Having gone through the article, I note that although there are 2 references that relate to some of the problems the organization apparently tries to address, the only references that mention the organization are its own website - this is obviously not permissible as a reliable source and cannot speak to its notability whatsoever. The article reads of a lot of WP:PUFFERY and original research. As a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT is to be temporary, and still belongs to Wikipedia, could you advise how you'll move forward to make this potentially usable? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
MunchTech
The page was deleted because "No explanation of the subject's significance ", there was plenty of information about the podcast network, it's shows and also what 'MunchTech' is. I don't see any reasoning for the page to be deleted, considering it went untouched for more than a month, then all of a sudden out of the blue was deleted. I would ask that this deletion is reconsidered. Thanks. -Techintensive (talk) 19:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept original research or articles for which there do not exist reliable sources of information.. It was also deleted for being promotional: with absolutely zerothird party reliable sources that even suggest anything to match Wikipedia's notability guidelines, it is clear that this subject is not suitable for an encyclopedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Flintzel Diao
As you can see the article Flintzel Diao is facing a debate of deletion. But there are things to consider so that the article will not be deleted. One, the article is verifiable and has relevance of Flintzel's life. Two, the article is notable, 10 out of 12 criteria for musicians and ensmbles. And three, the article is telling somebody's personal life so this means we am not lying, we are only telling the truth and nothing but the truth. And after all there is no harm of putting the article here. -Flint Diao (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Article not deleted - and be warned about WP:Forum shopping. Skier Dude (talk) 06:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Respawn Entertainment
Respawn is an independent game company worthy of an individual page. Currently it defaults to a section on Infinity Ward's wiki page. Respawn does have a significant amount of IW employees but also has many not affiliated with IW in the past. A quick Google search will reveal exactly how much press Respawn warrants on it's own and with a AAA project on the way, isn't it only a matter of time before Wikipedia will have to cave into letting them have their own page just like every other game company? -Kcar311 (talk) 03:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Of the article's two deletions, both are A7s. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
How is it an A7 when a rather large portion of Infinity Ward's page is devoted to it and the company is widely covered in the LA Times, USA Today, etc? Kcar311 (talk) 22:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Don't ask me; I'm just reporting the reason for deletion. :/ —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I have create the "Industrial Trucks" article last August 28, 2011 and it was okay and live the last time I check. I have not received any notifications or warnings about it. However when I logged in September my "Industrial Trucks"article was nowhere to be find. I don't know what happened. Whenever I try to click and visit the said page it turn to a redirection page "redirect page FORKLIFT Truck". I mean I can accept this accident only if I have been notified about the article merging or redirection or deletion, but I have not. Please clear my mind about this matter. I spent hours writing that article and I don't really appreciate that it was gone just like that. Hope to hear from you. Thanks and GOD bless! -Beindustrial (talk) 02:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Article is not deleted, therefore there is no need to undelete. You need to talk to UrbanTerrorist (talk · contribs) about this, as he's the person that redirected the article. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the info Jeremy! God bless! Beindustrial
Bobby Mackey
This page was deleted without any warning. All the information is factual and it is in regards to a country music singer in Northern Kentucky. I would like to know why it was deleted and how we can get it restored. Thank you. - I see now that it is because "Not enough available resources to continue to create/research this article." If we can undelete I can add sources to the article to make it available. Bobby Mackey has been featured on Syfy, Discovery, and many other national tv shows, he has released several CDs. We wish to have a biography of him on Wikipedia and hope that we can make the page better so that this does not happen in the future. -RCourtade (talk) 02:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Though deleted by PROD, the article was a poorly sourced biography of a living person. However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article about him. Also who is "we"? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have issue with this and need to further understand. The note says "requests for undeletion of articles deleted through the proposed deletion system should not be denied unless the article meets one of the general criteria for speedy deletion", however as you stated the article was deleted by PROD. I don't know a lot about how this Wikipedia stuff works but I'm trying to figure this out. I have read through the criteria for Speedy Deletion and I don't see anything that mentions lack of sources and therefore I believe the PROD system was the correct way, now I am making a request per the regulations set forth that this page be un-deleted or at least made available so that the information can be copied, reworked, cited, and music be added to it to make the page up to the standards of Wikipedia. Thank you. --RCourtade (talk) 03:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- The relevant policy here is actually Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Because of Wikipedia's visibility, the damage an unsourced biography can do to a person's personal or professional life is enormous, and thus unsourced biographies are speedily-deleted in order to protect both the subject from potential dangers from the hack job and Wikipedia from being sued by said subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Jeremy for the information, this makes sense. I would hate to see wikipedia or anyone else get sued for slander. I would like to know if there is anyway to get a copy of the text so that I can go through, edit and create a new page with sources? I have seen other instances here where the page is moved to a "User" page for further development. Would this be possible? --RCourtade (talk) 19:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:RCourtade/Bobby Mackey. GB fan 19:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! I'll work on editing the content and adding sources. I very much appreciate your help and understanding on this matter. --RCourtade (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Jeremy for the information, this makes sense. I would hate to see wikipedia or anyone else get sued for slander. I would like to know if there is anyway to get a copy of the text so that I can go through, edit and create a new page with sources? I have seen other instances here where the page is moved to a "User" page for further development. Would this be possible? --RCourtade (talk) 19:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- The relevant policy here is actually Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Because of Wikipedia's visibility, the damage an unsourced biography can do to a person's personal or professional life is enormous, and thus unsourced biographies are speedily-deleted in order to protect both the subject from potential dangers from the hack job and Wikipedia from being sued by said subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have issue with this and need to further understand. The note says "requests for undeletion of articles deleted through the proposed deletion system should not be denied unless the article meets one of the general criteria for speedy deletion", however as you stated the article was deleted by PROD. I don't know a lot about how this Wikipedia stuff works but I'm trying to figure this out. I have read through the criteria for Speedy Deletion and I don't see anything that mentions lack of sources and therefore I believe the PROD system was the correct way, now I am making a request per the regulations set forth that this page be un-deleted or at least made available so that the information can be copied, reworked, cited, and music be added to it to make the page up to the standards of Wikipedia. Thank you. --RCourtade (talk) 03:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Wildebeest (comics)
There were different Wildebeests in DC Comics and that Baby Wildebeest was a popular character. We also had information there for the Wildebeest Society, the New Wildebeests, and the Cybernetic Wildebeest. -Rtkat3 (talk) 23:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildebeest (comics), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)