Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/October 2011

1st Airborne Division (United Kingdom) edit

1st Airborne Division (United Kingdom)

13 articles

1st Parachute Brigade

1st Airlanding Brigade

2nd Parachute Brigade

4th Parachute Brigade

Operation Biting

Operation Freshman

Operation Turkey Buzzard

Contributor(s): Jim Sweeney, Skinny87, Ranger Steve

I believe the article meets the Good Topic criteria. It includes a set of similar, interrelated articles that cover a specific topic, which are all GA Class or above. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support All the articles on this division's major sub-units and operations are of GA standard - great work Jim. Nick-D (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support What can I say? Simply exemplary. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb. Superb. Buggie111 (talk) 14:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Headbomb

Comments

Comment articles are free of disambiguation links. all external links seem to be working. Alt text however, is in dire need of attention. In most of the articles. Not a reason to object, but since we're paying attention to the topic, might a well keep our readers with visual difficulties in mind. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alt text added Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment Operation Ladbroke, Operation Fustian, Battle of Arnhem, and Operation Doomsday are apparently in need of geocoordinates. It's also possible the others are in need of them, but they haven't been marked as such. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:39, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All geoocordinates added except for Operation Turkey Buzzard which covered 3,200 miles from England to North Africa. If required can you suggest where its located? Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't say I do. It's just something I noticed when checking the articles. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest the LZ in Tunisia, if that's possible. Buggie111 (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok done as suggested by Buggie111 Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad referencing in certain places Reflinks is trying to change several named references. This is usually do to a mismatch, such as using "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.158</ref>" in one place, and "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.156</ref>" in the other. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All references fixed.Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Minor styling issue, some of the references are listed as "Peters and Buist" while others are listed as "Shortt & McBride" (see e.g. 4th Parachute Brigade (United Kingdom)). One style should be picked and stuck with on all the articles. Likewise for "p.83" and "p. 145".Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone see this kind of inconsistency within a single article? - Dank (push to talk) 21:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I gave one above, but it's been fixed now. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:36, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All changed to the same style. Jim Sweeney (talk) 22:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Why not add British airborne operations in North Africa? It's a good article too. You might also consider Frederick Browning. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had not considered Browning, but the North Africa operation was not carried out by the 1st Airborne Division, just the 1st Parachute Brigade in an independent role.Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support (Disclaimer - main contributor to the Battle of Arnhem article). Ranger Steve ^Talk 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great example of a GT. Zangar (talk) 11:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent work all around. Keep it up! Parsecboy (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In the footnotes section of the lead article I'm seeing three long gibberish strings, the first being "?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000004-QINU?2?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000005-QINU?". Is this on my end or is something broken over there? Sven Manguard Wha? 17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dont see that Sven Jim Sweeney (talk) 21:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why! Zangar (talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have changed a <ref name=ferg15/> to <ref name=ferg15>Ferguson, p15</ref> which seem to have fixed it. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's got it, well done! Zangar (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Excellent and well-organised coverage of a focused topic area. (Disclaimer: I copy-edited two of these articles for GA.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons (season 10) edit

Contributor(s): User:Theleftorium, User:Queenieacoustic, User:Ctjf83, User:Qst, User:Scorpion0422, User:Gary King, User:Cirt

WP:DOH is finally back with another topic! Woo-hoo! --Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Three articles have dead links in them ("Mayored to the Mob", "Viva Ned Flanders", "Maximum Homerdrive"). I've tagged them as such.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gran2 has fixed this. Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support I've reviewed many of these for GA, and am happy to say they are a great set of articles. Ruby comment! 20:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support, with a minor caveat that I'm disappointed the plot summaries aren't ever sourced. There are so many sources out there that could provide non-viewers a chance to have an objective summary of each episode, instead of relying on the episode itself for the source. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We just follow the manual of style (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Plot section). Anyway, you can find plot summaries in at least two of the references we use in each episode.--Maitch (talk) 14:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I just like seeing a ref after the plot summary. Tis all. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support igordebraga ≠ 02:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rreagan007 (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good. Buggie111 (talk) 17:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout (Britney Spears album) edit

Blackout

7 articles

"Gimme More"

"Piece of Me"

"Break the Ice"

"Radar"

The M+M's Tour

I am nominating this for a good topic because I think it meets the criteria. All six articles are GA. I'm not sure if The M+M's Tour should be included though, but I consider it to be part of the background of the album. Xwomanizerx (talk) 18:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support The tour should be included, yes. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good. But I'm not sure about the tour though, as it wasn't really in support of the album. It was just kind of a random thing that she decided to do. — Status {^talk_contribs 01:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the tour is better in than out, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 19:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Alt text on this topic is in some need of attention. While it's not a reason to oppose, might as well take the FTC as an opportunity to think of our visually impaired readers. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 04:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Added alt text to all the articles of the topic. Xwomanizerx (talk) 04:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Admiral Hipper class cruisers edit

Admiral Hipper-class cruiser

6 articles

Admiral Hipper

Blücher

Prinz Eugen

Seydlitz

Lützow

A class of five German heavy cruisers built shortly before World War II, only three were completed. Prinz Eugen is probably the most famous, as she was Bismarck's consort on her only mission. This group of ships may eventually be integrated into a larger topic and a <pipe dream>Cruisers of Germany topic similar to the recently promoted Battleships of Germany topic</pipe dream>. Parsecboy (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support logical group that meets the criteria Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there's a few links that need to be disambiguated in German cruiser Prinz Eugen. I've marked them. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Should all be fixed, thanks for catching those. Parsecboy (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support more great work from Parsec Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 16:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's a {{citation needed}} in German cruiser Blücher, apparently. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:46, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been taken care of. Parsecboy (talk) 02:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Alt text is in some need of attention. Not a reason to oppose, but since the topic is getting scrutiny, might as well think of our readers with visual disabilities. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Topic meets the criteria. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The pipe dream is coming closer. Buggie111 (talk) 16:27, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-10 edit

Kepler-10

3 articles

Kepler-10b

Kepler-10c

Contributor(s): Starstriker7

Three good articles, a star and its planets. Looks good to me. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, there are some {{citation needed}} tags in Kepler-10. See book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- We're all in the clear now. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:58, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Another complete planetary system topic. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks good Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Road to... (Family Guy) edit

Road to... (Family Guy)

7 articles

Road to the Multiverse

Road to the North Pole

Contributor(s): GageSkidmore

The topic covers all of the episodes produced and aired during the Road to series of the animated comedy series Family Guy. I would like to promote this topic to good topic, as I believe it meets all of the criteria. --Gage (talk) 04:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support All look good to me. Ruby2010 comment! 17:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Reviewed two of these for GA; and have read through the others, which are also of suitable quality. GRAPPLE X 07:29, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this topic should probably get a book of its own, similar to Book:Treehouse of Horror. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Done. Gage (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the final portion of the "Segments" section of Road to... (Family Guy) is unsoured. Otherwise, very good topic. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Done. Gage (talk) 23:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Inspecting the external links reveal some problem with those of Road to... (Family Guy) and Road to Rhode Island. They seem to be referencing Google searches or something. See the book report ("Ext Links" tool) for details. There might be other issues with references to Film.com as well. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Done. Gage (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Seems like there are still a few in Road to the North Pole and Road to Germany (all to film.com). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment Done. Gage (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Topic meets criteria. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. - GamerPro64 20:13, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]