Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Fantasia Barrino discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 22:41:56 6 January 2020 (UTC) [1].
Fantasia Barrino discography edit
Fantasia Barrino discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Candyo32, WikiProject Discographies
This list has several issues. The lead has a "citation needed" tag, and it does discuss three of Fantasia's albums (The Definition Of..., Christmas After Midnight, and Sketchbook) or its related singles. The structure of the lead's third paragraph is also odd. By putting a lengthy part on "When I See U", the second single from Fantasia, before its lead single "Hood Boy" and third single "Only One U", the chronology is not entirely accurate. I would think the word "hit" would be discouraged for a featured list. The "music videos" table needs to be updated because Fantasia has released several music videos since "Without Me" back in 2013. There are also several issues with the citations. Reference 2 and 21 are marked as "permanent dead links", and there are bare urls (i.e. References 12, 13, 16, and 22). I believe all of these issues combined indicate that the list no longer meets the FLC criteria. Aoba47 (talk) 00:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep it took a few moments to fix the bare URLs, the use of "hit" and the [citation needed] in the lead. The rest needs more expertise, but probably doesn't amount to a delisting. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 10:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Thank you for your comment. I believe the absence of information on three of Fantasia's albums and their related singles in the lead is the biggest issue. It means the list is no longer comprehensiveness and does not fulfill a main point of the featured list criteria. I do not think that incorporating this new information into the lead would be an easy fix. Thank you for taking the time to look at the nomination. This is my first time nominating a featured list for removal so apologies for any mistakes made in the nomination. I would have tried to fix these issues myself, but I am trying to limit my Wikipedia time and I found the task of rewriting the lead to be too much for me right now. Aoba47 (talk) 12:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. That's why I suggested an expert needed to be involved. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 12:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination has been open for months without consensus to delist, so I'm going to go ahead and close it. --PresN 22:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.