Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nebula Award for Best Script/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:11, 4 September 2012 [1].

Nebula Award for Best Script edit

Featured list candidates/Nebula Award for Best Script/archive1

Nominator(s): Pres N 18:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, last one! The four story lists are down, so here we are with the odd duck of the Nebula family, the award for Scripts. It's all modeled after the other Nebula lists, with reviewer comments duplicated here. Thanks for reviewing! --Pres N 18:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support I discovered how hard it is to make such a list! Wonderful as usual. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 04:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Unlink fantasy, as per WP:OVERLINK
"and not including 1977, in which no nominee was given the award" → "but not including 1977, since no nominee was given the award"
Align references to the center

TBran dl ey 15:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, done, and done, though I don't know why you wanted the references in the center- it's actually quite complicated, you can't just apply "align=center" to the column, you have to go cell by cell. --Pres N 18:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. TBran dl ey 04:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

William Harrison is a dab.
It's The Lord of the Rings, not the Lord of the Rings.
Could have a look into using Category:Awards by year of establishment and disestablishment? I'm surprised I hadn't thought of that on your other Nebula lists!
"Beginning in 2010, it was discontinued " -> "The award was discontinued in 2010..."
In 1977 "since no nominee was given the award" why not? There was a shortlist...

The Rambling Man (talk) 09:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, done, done for all the Nebula lists, done, done- "no award" got the highest vote count, with a source. --Pres N 18:09, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Would provide an ISBN number for ref 6

That's the only issue I could find great work. NapHit (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't have one; it's not technically required, especially if the book is sold through mail-order instead of retail stores, as I believe this one was. --Pres N 15:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. NapHit (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support NapHit (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I can't see any remaining problems, and picked up a table formatting idea for my own FLC, what's not to like? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.