Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket edit

Nominator(s): – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second time of asking for this list. It has improved significantly since it was previous nominated back in December 2014. The list has also doubled to 26 centuries in that time. As always, I am happy to address any and all points raised. Thanks in advance to all reviewers. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Harrias ^talk 22:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* "The Proteas won the match..." – Probably not worth referring to them as the Proteas in an article like this; it isn't a particularly well-known nickname, and is probably more effort to explain than it is just to repeat South Africa.

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Might it be worth mentioning in the lead that the vast majority of the centuries were scored in the first innings of the match?

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The long key leaves a lot of white space next to it, could we put another picture in there?

Added a photo of Richard Levi who has the fastest T20I century to his name. – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Table looks good to me

Thanks! – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link ESPNcricinfo in ref #1 not ref #6

Good pick up. Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, this looks a pretty solid piece of work, well done. Harrias ^talk 09:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harrias, thanks very much for the prompt review. I have addressed and actioned your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – if you get a chance, could you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/1924 Winter Olympics medal table/archive1 for me? Harrias ^talk 20:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harrias, I have just reviewed the list. Thanks again for your comments and support. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"especially in the shortest format of the game." this is unreferenced, and looks like OR without one.
Removed – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"to the team scoring the century" I know what you're saying, but technically it isn't the team scoring the century, that's an individual achievement.

Fair point, reworded. – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Gayle's compatriot" again, I know what you're saying but one is Trinidadian, the other Jamaican, so I'm not sure "compatriot" is the right word here, the complexities of the "nation" of West Indies...

Another fair point. Changed to opening partner. – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"first ton" a little casual and not explained anywhere.

Changed to century – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 20 says "Archived from the original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved 15 October 2017." archive may be well out of date...

Updated the with latest archive capture. – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Sri Lanka leading" comma after Lanka.

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(1/2) etc is not listed in the key.

Added – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fix the pipe for "Beausejour Stadium".

Good pick up! Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TRM, welcome back! Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed all of your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support my concerns addressed, good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry _(talk) 06:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Vensatry

August 2016 series –> 2016 series

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the "top scoring in the first innings" bit needed? It should be quite obvious from the following sentence.

Removed – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Rahul's effort is a rare feat, one of seven centuries to be scored in the second innings." – The first-half is POV; it's better to "safely" rephrase the bit as something like: "Rahul's innings is one of the seven instances where a batsman scored a century in the second innings of a T20I match."

Reworded – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As of 10 October 2017

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The latest match was the 627th T20I. —Vensatry _(talk) 04:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)\[reply]

Updated – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The ODI cricket ground where the match was played – Is it necessary to mention "ODI"?

Good pick up! Changed to T20I and fixed the link. – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simply say "cricket ground". —Vensatry _(talk) 04:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cite the table

Another good pick up. Done. – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given that we have the sorting feature, noting down centuries in the table seems redundant.

Removed. – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

—Vensatry _(talk) 08:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vensatry, thank you so much for you comments. I have addressed each one above. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Nice work —Vensatry _(talk) 06:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vensatry! Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Center the ref column other than that support. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BeatlesLedTV, I have centred the ref column. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – All of the sources appear to be reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker reveals no problems (not counting the fact that the tool apparently has trouble with ICC links). Spot-checks of refs 32 and 40 also turned up no concerns. I'd say this is a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Giants2008, thanks for your review and comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.