Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Rutland/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Rutland edit
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Rutland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is the latest in my nominations of Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and is in the same format as FLCs such as Northamptonshire and Suffolk. I trust that this list will also be found to be of FLC standard. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments from BeatlesLedTV
That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Nope I got nothing else for you. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Rodw
Another nice list and comments from previous FLC nominations have been taken into account. Just a couple of minor questions:
In the description of Clipsham Old Quarry and Pickworth Great Wood we have "Bajocian Middle and Upper Jurassic". I would have said " Middle Bajocian and Upper Jurassic"
- Upper is an error and I have deleted it.
In Eye Brook Reservoir would it be worth wikilinking wigeon, teal, mallard and pochard?
- Done. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In Shacklewell Hollow would it be worth wikilinking Alder for those not familiar with the species?
- I am doubtful. Alder is about the genus and the source does not specify the species. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Is Anglicans online (Ref 1) the best source for the fact Rutland is a ceremonial county?
- It is the only one I could find. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- How about this BBC story or this book (intro page)?— Rod talk 16:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- They are both OK but what makes them better than Anglicans online, which seems marginally closer to being an official source? Dudley Miles (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose I'm thinking "user generated" for Anglicans online - but I could be wrong. Something like the London Gazette or a county council publication would be ideal.— Rod talk 17:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It is published by the Society of Archbishop Justus, so maybe I should have shown it as the publisher and Anglicans online as the website. Would that be better? I could not find an official source, a common problem as official sources often do not bother to spell out 'obvious' basic details. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep adding the publisher would work for me.— Rod talk 20:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can we provide a ref for Seaton Meadows being designated "Plantlife" (is this a designation or is this who owns/manages it - might be better in description).
- It is the manager and I have added the ref omitted in error. I think it is better to keep it in this column with the other managers. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As usual - minor quibbles.— Rod talk 09:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Many Thanks for your review. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for tweaks. I can now Support this list as meeting the criteria.— Rod talk 21:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- BeatlesLedTV and Rodw do you have any further comments? Dudley Miles (talk) 13:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
That's all I have, a typically excellent piece of work. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.