Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hahc21 00:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series edit

Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): — Arre and SoapFan12 15:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are nominating this for featured list because we believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, we believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments we feel that it is worthy of being a Featured List. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. We believe this list is worthy, considering we worked on it with the Featured lists, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series and Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series, in mind. It is very similar to the standard of those, therefore, we hope it is worthy of reaching that status. SoapFan12 15:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Crisco 1492 (talk)
*Comments from Crisco 1492
How do you add categories, when you are not able to edit?
Nvm. Done
 Done. I remove the image
 Done. I remove the image
 Done. I remove the image
  • File:Leannhunley01.jpg - I'm somewhat uncertain of this one's freeness, but not certain it's a copyvio either.
 Done. Remove the image
  • Elizabeth Lawrence is a dab link.
 Done.
  • What do you mean, "tables are not closed"?
  • Look very carefully at bottom of each table, first column. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:23, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. SoapFan12 13:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done yet. Check your rowspan parameter and make sure it is the same digit as the number of rows you are actually spanning. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you please be more clear? Which ones are needed to be fix? SoapFan12 16:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The table wasn't closed. Someone got the first one, and I just fixed the last one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:27, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay. Thanks, I am very sorry that you had to do that, It was my responsibilty. I was the only that was doing the changes, so I guess I got the first one. Yay! ahah...Are you ready, the resolved you're comments and you're support or is there more? Thanks again! This means a lot! SoapFan12 00:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confusion arose that year when the winner of Outstanding Supporting Actress, Beth Maitland, played a character of similar age to that played by Tracey E. Bregman, the winner of Outstanding Younger Actress. - How old, roughly?
  • General Hospital, is the most recent recipient of this award. General Hospital -- avoid repetition somehow
  • I've merged these sentences, is it okay now? Or a bit too long of a sentence?
  • reached five nominations, making her the most-nominated in this category. - feels unnecessarily verbose. Any other wording? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reworded.
Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Underneath-it-All
* The table in the "Total awards won" section needs to be fixed.
  • What exactly needs to be fix? Can you please clarify?
The table wasn't closed, but it has since been fixed. – Underneath-it-All (talk) 19:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thanks for the support! :) Oh, is it possible if you can resolved you're comments or is there more? SoapFan12 19:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 1 → add Guard Publishing Co. as publisher
 Done
  • Refs 4 + 13 → add Cox Enterprises as the publisher. Also add John N. Goudas as the author.
 Done
  • Ref 5 → add South Florida Media Company as publisher
 Done
 Done
 Done

– Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! SoapFan12 17:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments – prose has somewhat been dealt with, so I'll have a quick look at refs...

  • Tables ideally should meet MOS:DTT and include rowscopes and colscopes
 Done
  • Given you have provided weblinks to newspaper sources, are page numbers suffice? I would probably remove them, but it's up to you.
    • Comment: As most of the newspapers are at Google News Archive (and thus possibly on their way offline) I'd suggest keeping the page numbers. If GNews archive goes offline, we can still have the paper newspapers as a reliable source. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've got to agree with Crisco 1492. SoapFan12 17:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Publication sources need locations if they are not given in the title. (ie: USA Today, Variety, The Gazette, The Register-Guard, Deseret News, The Union Democrat)
Can you please be more clear? What do I need to add? SoapFan12 17:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The city where the work was published. So Variety would be location=Los Angeles, The Gazette would be Sonora, California, etc. This suggestion is per WP:CITEHOW. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. SoapFan12 19:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not necessary to have retrieve dates for external links – Lemonade51 (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done SoapFan12 17:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – It seems that the main table has the required rowscopes and colscopes. However, the smaller tables still appear to be lacking them. That's the one issue that stood out to me when I looked at the list. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done SoapFan12 09:54, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Superb job on organization and prose!
-Birdienest81 (talk) 23:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support All major issues have been addressed and I see nothing further. Great job!Caringtype1 (talk) 02:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "that originated at the" you mean "that was first awarded at..."?
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You use abbreviations in the info box but don't have them in the article, so add (NATAS) etc after the expanded version.
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the criteria for this category " you only mention one criterion, were others changed? If not then it should be "one criterion for this.."
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • " is the most recent recipient" maybe to prevent it becoming inadvertently inaccurate, "is the 2013 recipient.."?
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "After twenty-six years " -> 26.
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Total awards won" should be more like "Series with most awards" or something.
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not convinced you need "New York, New York" as the location. Simple New York would suffice.
 Done SoapFan12 20:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, meticulously sourced and well formatted. — Cirt (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Daytime_Emmy_Award_for_Outstanding_Supporting_Actress_in_a_Drama_Series/archive1&oldid=1138479437"