Wikipedia:Featured article review/Durian/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC) [1].

Durian

Notified: BorgQueen, Zefr, Bunchofgrapes, PhoebeJudge, WP Plants, WP Indonesia, WP Malaysia, WP Tambayan Philippines, WP Singapore, WP Food and drink, WP South Asia, WP India, WP Agriculture, WP Southeast Asia, WP Vietnam, WP Thailand, noticed 2022-02-17

Review section

This 2007 promotion needs a bit of a touch-up to continue to meet the FA criteria. As per Sandy's notice, there is uncited text, some dated production statistics, a one-sentence section about environmental impacts that needs additional context, and a lack of discussion about diseases/pests, especially since we have an entire list on that subject. (List of durian diseases and pests). The original FAC nominator has indicated on the talk page that they may not be interested in working this one back up. The #2 editor in the xtools authorship has not been notified because their contributions to the article are mainly just a giant IABot run. Hog Farm _Talk 17:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no prior history with this article but might be interested in trying to resolve these concerns. But I will also soon be working on The Core Contest, so my attention may be divided between articles for a bit. What is the usual timeline for FARs? DanCherek (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, FARs will be left open as long as work in continuing on the article, but it is generally ideal for their to not be overly long gaps in the article improvement process. The hope, though, is always to save the star when possible. Hog Farm _Talk 20:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will give it a shot! DanCherek (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek: - I see you've only edited the article once since April. Do you still think you'll be able to continue to make the needed improvements here? Hog Farm _Talk 20:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm having trouble trying to focus on more than one major article at a time, and need to prioritize TCC in the short term... no objections to proceeding to FARC if needed. DanCherek (talk) 20:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess move to FARC then, with the hope that it will be worked on there as well. Hog Farm _Talk 21:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting for FAR purposes - DanCherek has started working on this one. Hog Farm _Talk 13:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: work ongoing as of 28 April (t · c) buidhe 23:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could we get an update on status here? Nikkimaria (talk) 19:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per comments above-- work stalled. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, sadly. Effectively stalled out since April. Hog Farm _Talk 04:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, insufficient improvement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, two orange banners indicating that it a section needs to be rewritten. Edits have stalled. Z1720 (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.