hey

Welcome to Wikipedia! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page 1984 Indian Airlines Airbus A300 hijacking, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 21:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 12:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@User:SpacemanSpiff But for what reason, atleast provide me a expanation for my block, for which act i have been blocked, please provide explanation atleastZindahtohpyalabharde (talk) 12:50, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

It is there in the block log: "Clearly not here to contribute constructively to the encyclopaedia, picking up fights with everyone, edit warring, uploading BLP vio copyvios to Commons and using them here and overall causing an unnecessary time sink for productive editors" Now, a Commons admin will have to clean up the copyvio mess you have created there. —SpacemanSpiff 12:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@User:Aakash Singh India As i always said, you are a amazing editor, now field is open for you, you won i loose. they blocked me without giving reason, but brother, you have written that "you are a proud indian" on your userpage, if that is true, please just ask them if you could, the reason for my block. because i am not able to write anything anywhere elseZindahtohpyalabharde (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@User:SpacemanSpiff in context of all the issues you have stated as a reason for my block above, i just want to say, i agree i made mistakes, but since you or any other user warned me i didn't repeat that, if you took the example of edit war, it is only one time, you warned me i didn't repeat that, another example, about you said i uploaded copyrighted images in commons, but when you warned me from then i didn't repeat that. my these reasons are applicable to all of your reasons. i was a new editor, i was learning, but if you just block new editors in the process of their learning without giving them time to learn, then this is not fair. it is like i got admitted to class 10, teacher came to me on the first day and asked me for writing the final exam of class 10, and when i failed it, teacher demoted me to class 9. if you all continue to do this, one day wikipedia will face a shortage of editors OR there are another PERSONAL reasons to block me???Zindahtohpyalabharde (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zindahtohpyalabharde, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021 edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 11:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply