User talk:Yellow Evan/Archive 13

Latest comment: 12 years ago by United States Man in topic April 25 - 28, 2011 tornadoes

The Signpost: 7 November2011 edit

The Signpost: 14 November 2011 edit

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 November 2011 edit

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 November 2011 edit

GAN on hold edit

See here. Sorry for picking all these issues, but they'll prevent it from passing. Feel free to let me know if you need more time to fix them. HurricaneFan25 17:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 05 December 2011 edit

The Signpost: 12 December 2011 edit

The Signpost: 19 December 2011 edit

Happy Holidays! edit

  Happy Holidays!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, YE! – TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas! edit

HurricaneFan25 — 13:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 December 2011 edit


Your GA nomination of Hurricane Hilary (1993) edit

The article Hurricane Hilary (1993) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hurricane Hilary (1993) for things which need to be addressed. The Bushranger One ping only 01:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Cup - come join the Hurricane Cup! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year's! edit

The Signpost: 02 January 2012 edit

Re edit

Yes... my (t)rusty flower power computer finally went to the trash bin in the sky, and I've basically been too busy to get a new computer and get back to WP until now. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 09 January 2012 edit

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Yellow Evan. You have new messages at Jason Rees's talk page.
Message added 20:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Jason Rees (talk) 20:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2012 edit

WP Tropical Cyclones in the Signpost edit

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Tropical Cyclones for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 06:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 January 2012 edit

The Signpost: 30 January 2012 edit

WikiCup 2012 January newsletter edit

 

WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is   Grapple X (submissions), due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by   Ruby2010 (submissions), whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is   Jivesh boodhun (submissions), who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!

The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.

A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.

  •   12george1 (submissions) was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.
  •   12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
  •   Sp33dyphil (submissions) was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
  •   Sp33dyphil (submissions) is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
  •   Speciate (submissions) was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
  •   Jivesh boodhun (submissions) was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.

We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.

A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:23, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kathleen 1976 edit

I left comments about your GA nom of Hurricane Kathleen (1976) on the talk page of that article. For the reasons explained there I didn't actually start the review. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 02:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 06 February 2012 edit

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Good Article Barnstar
Thanks Yellow Evan for helping to promote Hurricane_Kathleen_(1976) to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 February 2012 edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2012 edit

The Signpost: 27 February 2012 edit

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter edit

 

Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was   Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was   Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were   Ruby2010 (submissions),   Cwmhiraeth (submissions),   Miyagawa (submissions) and   Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from   Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 00:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 05 March 2012 edit

The Signpost: 12 March 2012 edit

The Signpost: 19 March 2012 edit

The Signpost: 26 March 2012 edit

Talk:Hurricane Hernan (1996)/GA1 edit

It's been a couple of weeks since you agreed to take on the review of this GAN.

Nwhit has said that your request to JG is already been taken care of; can you please check to see if this is in fact the case or whether any of those issues remain, and post where the nomination is in terms of outstanding issues once you have? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2012 March newsletter edit

 

We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well!   Grapple X (submissions), of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's   Cwmhiraeth (submissions), thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's   Casliber (submissions), who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.

Congratulations to   Matthewedwards (submissions), whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to   12george1 (submissions), who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Wikipedia:Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from   Miyagawa (submissions) show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!

It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 23:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 02 April 2012 edit

April 25 - 28, 2011 tornadoes edit

Sorry for moving those pages and switching the redirects. I knew that wasn't the correct way to do it, but I was trying to see if I could go ahead and get it moved. If something like this ever comes up again I will just wait for an administrator to do it correctly. United States Man (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply