User talk:Yashthepunisher/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag Kashyap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huma Qureshi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Uploading images from Bollywood Hungama

To upload an image of Anurag Kashyap, it's fairly simple. Follow these steps:

• Choose an appropriate image here : http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/index/searchevents/q/anurag%20kashyap
• In Wikimedia commons, in the left-hand column, click on the "Upload file" tab under the "Participate" section.
• Click "Select media files to share" and upload the image that you have downloaded from Bollywood Hungama.
• "Continue" and click on "This file is not my own work".
• In the "source" tab, copy-paste the Bollywood Hungama link. The "author" will be Bollywood Hungama.
• Under "Now tell us why you are sure you have the right to publish this work:" click on "Another reason not mentioned above", and after selecting the button, you must provide the copyright license, which in this case will be "Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama". *Copy-paste this license in between open and close double parenthesis({{), and click on preview to check if it's okay.
• Click "next", and then simply upload it.
• The image and it's license will then be checked by a wikimedia administrator, and you will be able to use it here.

Do remember to only upload images from the website's "Parties and events" section, because they are the only ones that fulfill the licensing agreement.

All the best. Yours friendly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Its not only about uploading the Image, the other problem is the watermark. The word "Bollywood Hungama.com" plastered on the pictures. How can I get rid of them? since I'm not an expert on adobe or picasa. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Crop it off! Or else, post a watermark tag there and someone with expertise shall work on that. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anushka Sharma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma

The article Anushka Sharma you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Anushka Sharma for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma

The article Anushka Sharma you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anushka Sharma for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Anushka Sharma (estimated annual readership: 595,541) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Frankie talk 19:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

You can add it to your user page. To know what Million Award, a very rare barnstar, see WP:1000000. I also hope to get it when I Jacqueline Fernandez passes! :) -- Frankie _talk 19:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, and you will also get one soon. :) -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For taking Anushka Sharma to GA status. I'm really very glad to see it promoted. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 04:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanxx -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Yayyyyy!

Congratulations on bringing Ms. Sharma to GA status. I'd not come online for two days, and seeing that green symbol made my day. :) :) It had been long overdue, to be honest. And I may be a bit late, but welcome back. Hoping to collaborate more with you. Semanti 04:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanti Paul (talk • contribs)

I'm looking forward to it. :);) -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

BTW, do you know how to remove a watermark from a Image? -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

That's only possible through Photoshop. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I know, the Bollywood Hungama thing, right? So far the pictures I've uploaded could be cropped as to remove the watermark. But I'm not a Photoshop expert, so. -- Semanti Paul (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Can you please crop and upload this Image for Anurag Kashyap's infobox image?? The current one is quite shoddy. Since Its one of the pictures you uploaded. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Uh, that was before I knew pictures from Koimoi could not be used. But wait, I'll search for this particular event on BH and see if there's anything good. :) -- Semanti Paul (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanxx. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I believe the new picture will do. :)Semanti 17:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)--Semanti 17:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanti Paul (talk • contribs)

Yeah It will do, thanxx again.-- Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

Thank you so much - Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The featured barnstar
	That's for all the hard work you put in taking Anurag Kashyap filmography to FL status. Mubarak ho, Yash! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Shukriya one's again . - Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

An award for you!

The Rajinikanth Award of Excellence and Bravery

After failing two times, and being blamed for sockpuppetry in addition, you have managed to bring Anurag Kashyap filmography to featured list status. I gave this award to two great users who achieved some great, path-breaking goals with their unflinching efforts almost equal to the on-screen image of this cultural icon, and i find this effort of you similar! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I really can't digest so much appreciation from you all guys. Thank you so much Pavan for this. But, I don't think I deserve this. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I find your effort sincere and as hardwork involving as the larger-than-life on-screen persona of Rajinikanth. That's why i gave this to you. Do try to watch his films some day, he is surely something more than a group of Chuck Norris facts. I quote Mullum Malarum and Thillu Mullu (remake of Gol Maal) as fine examples for this. But if you too like to celebrate his larger-than-life persona like me, you can find a plenty of films in his 158-film long career. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I have seen few Rajnikant movies like Chandramukhi, Enthiran, Sivaji, Hum, Phool Bane Angaray, Bulandi and few others. But I will try to watch the one's recommended by you. :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your message let me knew that Rajinikanth reprised his role from Pedarayudu in Bulandi. You can find a good sequence in the Telugu version here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I wish I could understand telugu. :( Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The scene and the actor are the same. His aggression was very high in the Telugu version. His looks differ as per the nativity. I gave this scene to watch because you watched Bulandi and are familiar with the concept. Anyways, i like the way he reacts to his brother-in-law's warning and the way he proudly embraces the death. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

It's a good movie and whatever Rajni does on screen, he does that with style!! Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

He does it, no doubt. But do not expect the regular frills attached with Rajini's name in the films i suggested. They purely belong to Rajinikanth, the actor. Anyways, i wish you the very best for your future endeavours and message me with your feedback once you watch both of em, of course in your free time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Okay Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

As far as Chandramukhi is concerned, more than Rajini, it's Vadivelu (the guy whom Rajini gives a run for the money) who's hilarious! How was he in it?  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 01:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

A request

Hi..! I have seen your current contributions to my most favorite singer, Shreya Ghoshal's article. I have developed Arijit Singh's article a few months back and I would like to kindly request you to review that article at your convenience and do a little copy editing in order to meet the article to a Good status which you are very very good at! Again it is just a request and only if you are willing. If you don't have time could you please see the article and check whether I am on the right track with the article please. Just a little feedback and a way to improve will do. Thank You very much. Shaphiu (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

@Shaphiu: I'm trying to take her article to GA status. One's i'm finished with that, I will look through Arijit Singh's article. It looks good already and after some c.e, it will be suitable for GA. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much Yashthepunisher. :) Shaphiu (talk) 13:42, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Mention not. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Dookudu

This list has been promoted to FL status yesterday and is my first FL success. Thanks for reviewing/commenting/supporting the list's promotion at its FLC. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Congrats! Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shreya Ghoshal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shreya Ghoshal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shreya Ghoshal

The article Shreya Ghoshal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shreya Ghoshal for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Anushka Sharma

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	The Good Article Barnstar
	For your efforts in bringing Shreya Ghoshal to GA status. Good job! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you once again. Yashthepunisher (talk) 03:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

restoring content must be accompanied by reliable source

re your edit summary [1] . It is not "ruining" anything to remove unsourced claims and trivia. It is unequivocally your responsibility to provide a valid inline citation for every claim that you have restored to that article.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The "lead too short" tag was needed, but you just started tampering with the table. I'm working on it and soon it will be sourced. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

again, your description is entirely incorrect and inappropriate. You do not WP:OWN the article, anyone can "tamper" with it. And removal of unsourced trivia is improvement not "tampering" .-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

See this version of your edit, where you removed the note section; which contains the awards info. Mentioning his awards and nomination is not trivia. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes I did remove the note section; which contains the awards info which had NO SOURCES along with a lot of other trivial crap about "dual roles" and "special guest appearances" which also had NO SOURCES. and I replaced the trivia collector column header with "Language" which is an encyclopedic item that could merit note.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

You are more experienced than me here, and you know how a note section is required for a FL. We shouldn't be wasting our time arguing over this minor issue. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

What I know is that I may remove content that is unsourced, and it is not a minor issue for you to violate policy by restoring it without providing an inline citation to a reliably published source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

As you can see, I have already started to add sources, so it won't be unsourced for long. The things you are calling "crap" are the same things that are mentioned on note section of many indian FL's. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

For your significant contribution to Shreya Ghoshal article. I made some major changes in the infobox and expecting you to have a look. I am currently working on one of my subpages to make it a featured one. Whenever it's ready, I'll inform you. Please extend a supporting hand. Regards. Bubaikumar (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the coffee and I have seen the infobox. Its much better now. Yashthepunisher (talk) 03:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Please give a look at this message on my talk page and inform if you are interested. Bubaikumar 06:49, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shreya Ghoshal

The article Shreya Ghoshal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shreya Ghoshal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 03:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Sargun Mehta GAR

Sargun Mehta, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Official Shreya Ghoshal Links

Please don't remove the Facebook and Instagram links of Shreya Ghoshal. As these links are official. Zafar24 (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For bringing List of accolades received by Lagaan to FL status. Congratulations! One more consecutive success, and it's a hat-trick for you. All the best. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you @Pavanjandhyala:, I have nominated Amitabh Bachchan filmography for FL. Hope it will be my hat-trick. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vishal Bhardwaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries

What do you actually mean by puff here? Although your changes were not nonconstructive, I suggest you please be more clear with your edit summaries. Also, per WP:TPG you're not supposed to change others' comments as you did here, especially in their talk pages. —Vensatry _(Talk) 06:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Words like "highly" and "unlike most filmmakers" are not neutral, and Puff means puffery; if you didn't get it. The latter was just in good-faith, and it has been reverted. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

You mean WP:WEASEL? While removal of "highly" makes sense, I don't think the "unlike ..." bit is puff. I haven't checked if it's fully covered in the source, but that is not exaggeration. Firstly, you need not WP:AGF on sock-puppets. Secondly, refactoring others comments is a violation of WP:TPG. There is hardly any good faith here. —Vensatry _(Talk) 06:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

The "unlike.." bit is a POV statement. There are many film-makers who have made films without assisting anyone before like Banerjee, Kashyap, Bhardwaj, Gowariker, Nolan, Tarantino and many more. That doesn't mean we need to include that. Its clearly non-encyclopedic. Also, I have understood to not to tamper with other's comment, so no need to constantly remind me that. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

From your argument, isn't it pretty obvious that the claim doesn't border WP:PUFF? Given we have sources which completely cover a particular claim, which is non-controversial and non-promotional, I don't see a reason why you term it "puff" and "unencylopedic". —Vensatry _(Talk) 09:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Oh the irony! You assume good-faith on blocked sock-puppets, but behave in the exact opposite way towards other editors. In my previous response, I was suggesting that you need not AGF on sock puppets; it wasn't a reminder. As far as I can see, that's the only time I used WP:AGF in your talk page. —Vensatry _(Talk) 09:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm not interested in arguing with you, so let it be the way you want it to be. What other editors are you talking about? You? Also, my edit on that talk page was reverted, and here you were; telling me the same. That's why i said that. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad since you really understood what's encyclopedic. —Vensatry _(Talk) 09:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I think we should stop this mess. Its not helpful for either one of us. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Sure! I don't see this as an argument. But you should understand what is 'encyclopaedic' and what is not. —Vensatry _(Talk) 10:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Mayabazar

I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

		Happy Diwali!!!
		Sky full of fireworks, Mouth full of sweets, Home full of lamps, And festival full of sweet memories... Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

@Dharmadhyaksha: Thank you and same to you. And i'm sorry for what I said to you at the GAR, i just over-reacted. It wasn't personal. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vishal Bhardwaj

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vishal Bhardwaj you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vishal Bhardwaj

The article Vishal Bhardwaj you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vishal Bhardwaj for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manoj Bajpai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jail (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manoj Bajpai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatehpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

FLC

Ah, now I got your intentions right. Just because I didn't return to your FLC, you're trying to pull my leg wherever possible. FYI, that's not a "review". —Vensatry _(Talk) 17:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

My sole intention was to express what I felt about the "female wikipedian" issue. I just though that if you can mock me by amening me why can't I. And what's with "pull my leg wherever possible"?? Where else have I done that before? You are the one who lectured me on AGF and then didn't gave a damn about my list. What's not a review? what are you talking about? Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Huh, then why did you brought up the FLC discussion at her talk page? 'Where else have I done that before?' So you're implying that you made an attempt there? 'You are the one who lectured me on AGF and then didn't gave a damn about my list.' Where on the earth are both interrelated? If someone gives you a 'lecture' on AGF, it doesn't mean they have to necessarily review your FLCs. —Vensatry _(Talk) 17:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

You are completely out of focus right now, copy-pasting my comments. If you had no intention to review the FLC, you should never have visited it or said: "I'll review this one in the next couple of days". Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Offcourse I pulled you leg with that last comment just like you did with the amen. But the whole "flc" thing is useless now, as you have opposed more list/articles than you have supported. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Seriously? If only you are good at reading comprehension, I was merely responding to your queries separately. As for the latter, is it an unwritten rule for FLCs? Please clarify! —Vensatry _(Talk) 17:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Yeah it was me who thought that you will help. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

The "out of focus" bit was a metaphor. You still haven't cleared what was the "review"? Yeah I made an attempt, just like you did. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Fine if you won't visit that FLC. But please think about it that your cliffhanger comments might be an obstruction in getting it a clear consensus. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Unless someone offers a review, I don't think it's mandatory that one should re-visit nominations. In my case, it was definitely not a review. Wikipedia is a voluntary project, so you can never force somebody to do something for you. And, I never asked clarification for the 'out of focus' thing. So that's redundant. —Vensatry _(Talk) 06:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You mistook my request with forcing. I have never forced you for anything, it was you who visited the flc. I just thought that you will continue with some more comments that might me helpful. If its redundant, then what the edit confilct was about? Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Huh, but then requests should be done politely. I absolutely see no reason to raise the FLC issue at TrueHeartSusie3's talk page. If you think you never forced me at any point, then what's the intention behind this? Finally, what does 'edit conflict' has to do with this argument? I'm confused —Vensatry _(Talk) 07:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Also, I never 'mocked' you by saying 'Amen'. I was rather referring to the discussion. You might want to find out the meaning of the word (for the given context). This is bad faith at the extreme. —Vensatry _(Talk) 07:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

How many times will I have to request you politely. What are these then? [2] [3]. It's been a month since you left that comment with no intention to return. What do expect me to do then? request you over and over again. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

I even apologised to you when i realised my mistake there, and you said to review it. Now, you are accusing me of bad-faith, after all this..really? Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Didn't I respond to your comments after those "polite" requests at the nomination page? As I said earlier, you cannot expect editors to re-visit when they hardly conducted a review. In my case, it was just a single comment. Yes I said 'I'll review it in the next couple of days', but of late I'm not finding adequate time even for my tasks. So you cannot expect me to review your lists. That said, it's not an unwritten rule that one should re-visit the candidate after leaving a single comment. Additionally, I never opposed the candidate. So that shouldn't naturally affect the prospects of the candidate's promotion. If the delegates ask me, I'll respond. You should learn a lot about how stuff works here. —Vensatry _(Talk) 07:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

"I'm not getting time" is just a lame excuse. We give priorities to things the way we want to. Anyway, i don't want this conversation to end up badly; so we should end this now. You don't want to comment there, fine. But i feel that your comments at the FLC were quite helpful. As per learning the stuffs here: I agree I know nothing. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)