Xxiao ucb
DYK for Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC edit
 | On 9 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first time a circuit court weighed in on the scope of DMCA §1202, which prohibits the removal of Copyright Management Information (CMI), was in the Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Please feel free to edit my Doe v. Shurtleff article and let me know if you have any questions/suggestions, then provide the Did You Know nomination. Thanks!
108.221.17.185 (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4 edit
Hi. When you recently edited Doe v. Shurtleff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Doe v. Shurtleff edit
Hello! Your submission of Doe v. Shurtleff at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 17:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Doe v. Shurtleff edit
Hello! Your submission of Doe v. Shurtleff at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 22:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Doe v. Shurtleff edit
| | On 7 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doe v. Shurtleff, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in Doe v. Shurtleff, an Oregon law requiring registered sex offenders to provide to the state all of their internet identifiers was ruled constitutional? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doe v. Shurtleff. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox edit
| | On 16 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox, a court in Oregon, United States, held that a blogger was not a member of the media? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |