WorldPizzaDay

A page you started (Hiero's Journey (novel)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hiero's Journey (novel), WorldPizzaDay!

Wikipedia editor Human3015 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

add section "reference " to the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Human3015's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

February 2017

Some of your addition to Everglades University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I have also deleted your sandbox 3, as it contained an unattributed copy of the article as well as some copyright violations from external websites. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Freelance writer

I have to ask you if you have received any payment for editing here. You are required by the Terms of Use to declare if you are. Doug Weller talk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

• I agree with Doug Weller: this is a relevant question, since your edits are again reverted as not neutral. Whether the editing was paid or not, promotional editing is blockable. Drmies (talk) 05:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
• OK, I've seen enough, after the ads you wrote for Steinger, Iscoe and Greene, Michael S. Steinger, and Everglades University. Doug Weller, ElKevbo, Jbhunley, feel free to disagree with me, since I'm going to block this editor for undisclosed promotional editing. Drmies (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Good block. He has listed a picture of Steinger, File:Michael Steinger formal.jpg, as "own work" which pretty much clinches it (unless he's falsifying the credit which would be bad too) Jbh ^Talk 01:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steinger, Iscoe and Greene

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Steinger, Iscoe and Greene, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jbh ^Talk 01:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael S. Steinger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael S. Steinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael S. Steinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh ^Talk 01:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)