Woerich
A barnstar for you! edit
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
A barnstar for your excellent anti-vandalism work. All hail Armok (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
Another barnstar for you! edit
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for your great anti-vandalism work! LizardJr8 (talk) 2 April 2020 |
Hi, sorry about the revert on Thomas Massie. The quickest way to clear all of the pending changes (including the latest BLP violation) was to revert all, unfortunately that caught your earlier reversion as well. Schazjmd (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
William Adamson edit
Hi there. I noticed you recently reversed changes I made (before I made a proper Wikipedia account) to the William Adamson page because they "appeared non-constructive." I'm new to Wikipedia, and thus may be somewhat unfamiliar with the proper protocol for making changes, but my changes were both constructive and correct. William Adamson was not the father of William Murdoch Adamson. I know this because the latter was my great-great grandfather, and I have sources that definitively prove his father died in Kilmarnock in 1911.Skinnylittletom (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Skinnylittletom: Please read WP:verifiability. Woerich (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Editing to add: please see the reply I left at the article talk page and the welcome message I posted to your talk page. Woerich (talk) 03:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Get well soon! edit
So sorry to hear you're battling COVID. I hope it's not too horrible for you and that you feel well again soon. Schazjmd (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, please be careful about WP:3RR and WP:BLP. Thanks for the report, but this isn't monochrome – it's pretty grayscale. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
New message from Andrew nyr edit
Message added 03:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived edit
Hi Woerich! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Great editor edit
Dear Woerich, I have not known your work for long but what I have seen has been great. I noticed that you have Covid, and I just wanted to say I hope you get well soon! Thank you for helping revert vandalism with me on rc patrol!
Feel better,
Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 05:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
About Vox (political party) edit
The article Vox (political party) was already specified as "right-wing to far-right" and not solely as "far-right". I'm just returning it to this previous (and correct) description. The user that modified to exclude all the other sources and specifying the party as only far-right is the one who needs to achieve consensus on that undue edit. --168.235.134.215 (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)