Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit

Hello, WikiuserUK, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{Help me}} on your talk page here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Chillum 18:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

WikiuserUK (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, why am I being blocked? I simply asked if a page can be restored? can you kindly please unblock me and restore the page Broadbandchoices? much appreciated

Accept reason:

Because your only edits are requesting the undeletion of a page which the original author couldn't undelete because they were blocked. It's a pretty obvious sock puppet. Origamite 14:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Let's assume for the moment that WikiuserUK is the same person as Broadbandchoices1 (not actually certain - two people can be interested in the same topic). That account was blocked for a username violation which means creating a new account is both appropriate and recommended. I fail to see how a block was justified. Close watching to make sure promotional edits don't happen, sure, but not a block. As such, I am unblocking. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
@ThaddeusB: Actually User:Broadbandchoices1 was blocked using a {{spamublock}} template, not a {{uw-softerblock}} - you will note, if you check the block settings for that account, that account creation is actually switched off (this account was created on a new IP). The block covers both the inappropriate username and the promotional editing, which has not been addressed at all by this user. I would suggest that you reconsider this unblock, at least until the issues raised on the previous account are dealt with. Yunshui  14:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I would argue the first block was unnecessarily harsh - the actual article they created was barely spammy at all. Even so, to be unblocked, the most that account would have to do is logon, request a username change and agree not to edit the article in question in mainspace. That more or less has been agreed to implicitly here. (I have already been talking with this user on WP:REFUND for a day now.)
It is not at all uncommon for two SPAs to be different people and interested in the same subject, so I'm not convinced they are the same person here. Regardless, I am taking responsibility for monitoring this account and making sure it edits appropriately. I will reblock quickly if needed.
WikiuserUK, please follow the advice I gave at REFUND - edit the article only in draft space and use the articles for creation process. Contact me if you have questions. Don't make me look bad for helping you here. Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 14:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you ThaddeusB (talk) I have looked at the draft broadbandchoices page and I still cannot see why it was initially deleted, all the info on the page is 100% accurate and true and there is no obvious inappropriate advertising. Anyhow I will get someone in the office to review and update the content soon and submit for review. thanks!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Broadbandchoices (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! WikiuserUK, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Broadbandchoices (September 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! WikiuserUK, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply