Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 18:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! WikiChic, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Producer) (December 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bradv 03:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiChic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I requested for deletion of a page before creating a new one (same profile). I did so because the page title was no longer correct after the page was first declined and I had no option to adjust it. Please, I did not mean to create multiple pages but opt for deletion of one for anotherWikiChic (talk) 19:14, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

For the present. Your unblock request is incorrect, I believe accidentally. You did not just create multiple pages; you created multiple accounts. I am prepared to believe that this was accidental, although I cannot do so without some input from you. When you created Gm2018 what did you believe you were doing, and why? And given that you have created two accounts, which one do you see as your real account? I note that you have edited the same article, at different times, from both. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiChic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Honestly, I am not directly responsible for the extra account created. Could you please delete the extra account so that I can continue using this? Please, I've tried all I could to find and to delete the second account but have no success yet WikiChic (talk) 00:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This will require additional explanations. You are not directly responsible? What exactly was going on there? Huon (talk) 14:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiChic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please, I had been a bit confused about the duplicate account issue until I asked my wife if she tried creating a Wikipedia account for herself. I deeply apologize for what happened, I use her computer to work at times and she has no restriction on my email. She was only trying to have her own account after I told her we can not share WikiChic without discussing with me. Please, I am sorry and deeply apologize for that grave bridge in a rule here. It won't happen againWikiChic (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your explanation keeps changing. In your first appeal you said "I did not mean to create multiple pages"; in your second appeal "I am not directly responsible for the extra account created" and in your third appeal "she has no restriction on my email. She was only trying to have her own account after I told her we can not share WikiChic without discussing with me.". Apart from the inconsistencies, that add substantial doubt to your explanations, by stating that your wife used your account you accept leaving it insecure. Consequently, your account is compromised. I am now revoking your talk page access since compromised accounts are never unblocked. For any further appeals you must use WP:UTRS. Just Chilling (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gorky M (January 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply