Wheretheidivides
May 2018 edit
Hello, I'm Tillerh11. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ready Player One (film) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tillerh11 (talk) 16:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Last warning: stop inserting your own theories into Wikipedia articles. Drmies (talk) 02:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)- Enough already with your commentary. Please see WP:SYNTH. Your theories are "verified" only by a reference to a manual, which of course says nothing about what goes on in the movie--"Another statement was that they said that the Atari 2600 Adventure had the world's first video game Easter Egg. This too is wrong" is an obvious example of editorial commentary. You need reliable secondary sources to verify the factual nature of what's said in the movie, what that means, and how it is somehow incorrect--and you need a secondary source also to explain that this in some way matters. It's a movie, a work of fiction, not a documentary. I'm blocking you for your continued edit warring. When that block expires you may take your case to the article talk page and propose what you want to add. If you simply return to this edit warring over material that falls foul of WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH, you will most likely be blocked indefinitely, per WP:NOTHERE, since that will indicate you are not here to improve our encyclopedia. Drmies (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of SlifkerGames for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SlifkerGames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SlifkerGames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aspening (talk) 00:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)