Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thanks for your hard work in Recent changes patrol reverting vandalism. You're doing a great job. Just remember to warn the editors using the warn button on their user-talk page. Enough ignored warnings will eventually lead to blocks. Minima© (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, For the SurveyMonkey polls, I think it would be better if we chose just one state instead of the 3 or 4 so it's not listy. Also, maybe say "SurveyMonkey (for Axios)". Thanks. Benwitt (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Conrad Murray: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 22:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Can you please tell me how to create a Wikipédia page cause our University teacher give us a homework or should I use a project is to create a Wikipédia page on a random subject so can you please tell me how
I have no idea why you reverted my edits on Lightning Jack. They were not vandalism. I put a lot of hard work into researching the additions I made and sourcing them. I didn't go through 8 pages of Google results and adding nearly 30 references and typing up summaries from sources I couldn't copy so you could revert my additions without explanation and undo all my hard work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Tillerh11. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
@HickoryOughtShirt?4: You are correct, simple mistake, the user reverted the vandalism, and I didn't catch their reversion. My mistake. I have apologized to the user. Tillerh11 (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I suggest you remove your final warning to them since users are allowed to remove warnings they get from their talk pages, the only thing a registered user isn't allowed to remove is a declined unblock request. Cheers, - Tom | Thomas.W talk 20:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Remember to warn users ;-)Edit
Thanks for working to patrol recent changes and revert vandalism! It's a thankless job and I can use all the help I can get ;-). Just remember that after you revert disruptive or questionable edits, you need to warn the user regarding the behavior. Otherwise, I won't be able to block the user if the disruption continues; no warnings mean that they haven't been talked to and given a chance to stop. Thanks again for everything, keep up the excellent work, and I wish you happy editing. Cheers ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer grantedEdit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
As per your inquiry into my new membership and curioof my involvement with recent edits and vote, I assure I am not a puppet or scammer. I am a avid Kash Jackson supporter and a seeker for truth and honesty. When I look up on a reference sight for information about a(n) election I would hope all candidates on the ballot that my vote may go to would appear on an informative media outlet such as Wikipedia. My intention is honest and to also speak for your other inquiry, my fiancé April, she supports me and we share a computer as well as a common goal. I do understand the basis of your interest and wanted to remedy any possible conspiracy theorist that may ensue. Thank you. Endurrance (talk) 00:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Reversion on Alfons TrackiEdit
- @Jmar67: It's possible I made a mistake. Changing something to "pro-fascist" or those kind of descriptions is often done as vandalism, so that's why I reverted, because that's what it looked like. I don't really know much about the person or topic (I was just reverting vandalism) and looking closer at it, a translation error is entirely possible in this case. You can restore, I won't revert again. I apologize if I made a mistake. Tillerh11 (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit
Hello, I'm Tillerh11. I noticed that in this edit to 2 Days & 1 Night, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tillerh11 (talk) 03:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
My reply: Hi, I'm sorry I didn't add the reason why I removed the content. I just moved it to the Former's section from the Current's section. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mutcx (talk • contribs) 03:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Us (2019) EditEdit
I already provided an edit summary in which I explained the reasons for my edit. If you had an issue with one of those reasons, please address them instead of falsely claiming I didn't provide any. As for the reasons themselves: first, the plot section is plagiarized word for word from Monica Castillo's review of the film on RogerEbert.com. Second, it wasn't a complete plot summary and thus was redundant to the existing "Premise" section. Finally, due to the preceding point, the plot summary was written in a fashion poorly suited to summarizing a plot. For instance, it mentions minutiae like Janelle Monae playing in a particular scene. This is because, as stated previously, it was written by a reviewer to give readers a sense of the film, not to describe the plot. I will be restoring my edit. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 03:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- @22.214.171.124: Yes, it is. I do not really know about the film, I was just reverting vandalism, and that's what your removal of the plot summary looked like. Plagiarism, however, is a valid reason to do that. I don't know anything about the film itself, so I will not revert again. Sorry about that. Tillerh11 (talk) 03:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)