Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (August 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MarcGarver (talk) 07:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Waimze! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 07:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I only just saw your message after submitting another draft for review or I would have joined you at Teahouse! I took your advice and worked on the style, stripping the article right back. I've looked at articles of contemporaries and hope I've got the balance right now! Waimze (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (January 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (September 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLIfanofmrtennant 06:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Venetia Scott has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Venetia Scott. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 08:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (January 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your first article edit

Hi there, Waimze. I'm happy to see Venetia Scott has finally appeared on main space. If you intend to continue writing biographies of women, you might find it useful to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Ipigott, I’ll do so. It’s good to see there is movement to redress the imbalance. Waimze (talk) 10:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply