Vixhere

Deletion discussion about Anuj Saini

Hello, Vixhere,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Anuj Saini should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuj Saini .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 21:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Arvind Parashar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arvind Parashar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvind Parashar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 18:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Online banking have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ram Chadha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Chadha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Chadha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 12:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of CbdMD.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CbdMD.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CbdMD.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 12:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, like you did in the article CbdMD.com. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 13:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Scope creep:, I'm sure that's not advertising, all information in the article is well sourced, also as I know an article is nominated for deletion I value you comment strong delete, but read the article first it has no advertisement there is nothing that I'm trying to sell and if there is anything promotional and advert let me Know I'll remove the part from article, article does have all the reliable sources (maybe not independent but WP:RS is passed. as it's CBD company it's already passing WP:GNG, and before writing that article as it's my first non-biography article, I read WP:ORG and it's clearly passing seeing its notability depends on a reliable source, every sentence I have written is based on reliable source it may not be an independent but that can be sorted later. it's stub article it should be on Wikipedia, cbdMD is the first American CBD industry company to have space in NYSE that's what it makes notable in the first place. you have a lot of experience than me I'll respect whatever you say. I'm still a learner. and I don't think it deserved a warning article was already nominated so why the warning? Vixhere (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Vixhere, Using a full qualified url as the name of the article, on an article which reads like a company brochure indicates to me that it is highly promotional. Are you being paid to write this article. scope_creep^Talk 20:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

I dont think it will survive afd. Two policies which are asserted on it are WP:ORGIND or WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep^Talk 20:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 11:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

For a starters, I don't think you have disclosed all your paid contributions (e.g. [1]). Either way, you are blocked for abusing Wikipedia to promote your clients. It's obvious you're not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. MER-C 11:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

This is blatant spam. MER-C 20:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vixhere (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello,@MER-C: Yes I did create articles underpaid contributions but that wasn't my only purpose I created some article were not paid without having any COI, who doesn't like getting paid? but if thats the case I won't write any paid article from now on. I Disclosed every paid article I created and If I have not disclosed then it's not paid piece. I will request you to unblock and I promise I will stop creating Paid articles, I'll only contribute Information. Vixhere (talk) 12:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It is hard to trust that you have indeed disclosed all your paid contributions or that you will in the future, especially where you do not say what it is you will edit about in the future. As such, I see no cause to unblock you at this time, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Ram Chadha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Chadha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Chadha (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 15:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Anuj Saini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anuj Saini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuj Saini (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tripti Shakya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tripti Shakya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bhojpurifilmiduniya.com/2015/12/singer-tripti-shakya.html?m=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 19:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Coach Meddy for deletion.

Manual notification. Yadda yadda yadda, same as the other notifications above. The AFD is at WP:Articles for deletion/Coach Meddy. Alsee (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Rajiv Dingra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajiv Dingra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Dingra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 22:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Vixhere/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Vixhere/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.elitetraveler.com/shopping-lifestyle/precious-posts-designer-of-the-month-alex-sepkus. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)