Vanished user 6292789

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Flat Earth are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Wikipedia talk pages are not forums for discussing the subject to how to improve the article. See WP:FORUM Robynthehode (talk) 16:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I removed your whole post because it did not seem to me (and another editor who thanked me for removing your post) to follow Wikipedia rules as per the note in my post above. Talk pages are not forums for discussing the subject of an article in general but a space to discuss how to improve the article. You also failed to sign your post. If you didn't know you can do this by adding four tildes at the end of your post. This helps in any edits whether on the talk page or main article space. If you disagree with my removal of your post by all means go to the talk page to discuss your reasons why you think your contribution was valid and in accordance with WP:FORUM. Thanks Robynthehode (talk) 00:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying you are not a native English speaker. The post did seem to ramble but I understand now. However please read the linked article about talk pages not being forums. There are plenty of Youtube videos out there debunking flat earth ideas. I would suggest you watch those. Robynthehode (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Refan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Refan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 05:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

• I have zero idea on "advertising": I looked up Refan on Russian Wikipedia and added why Refan is "way too known in ex-USSR". No need to delete something you cannot buy in Western Europe.Uchyotka (talk) 06:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Refan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Refan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:COVID-19 vaccine for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Also, this article and talk page are in English. Using non-English doesn't help, as the readers who come to this talk page expect comments and collaboration in English. Zefr (talk) 22:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

GS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

There is a page-specific restriction that also must be observed: "Editors are prohibited from adding biomedical content without WP:MEDRS-compliant sources in this article." --RexxS (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Runglish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quant. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

AN

I would recommend you to remove your last comment on AN. It is simply not helpful. You said: Я тут вспомнил, как мне в апреле предьявили за эпитет "молчаливый палач". What are you talking about? My very best wishes (talk) 03:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I do believe you failed to auto-translate the dialectisms I used. Sent from my 8phone. Uchyotka (talk) 05:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I asked because this your comments implies that you probably edited from another account. My very best wishes (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Good thing you are really interested to know what the dialectisms mean. I told him this: "I remember now, in April, I faced a warning over using "silent executor" epithet". Basically, I tried to explain to some spammer, what a certain user, Q-Bit Array, does and doesn't, without calling Q-Bit Array "cleaner" or something. Also, I resorted to Russian, since Motin's English is so basic Motin openly admits it with "this user ... basic English" plaque.

OK, thanks. My very best wishes (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, I'm RexxS. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gam-COVID-Vac without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RexxS (talk) 00:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

When you have an issue with an article, discuss it on the article's talk page, not my talk page. Your behaviour is well below that expected for editing an article under general sanctions and I'm seriously considering asking for sanctions to be imposed on you if it doesn't improve. --RexxS (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

• All of a sudden, my particular boldness over deleting a certain Canadian PDF is covered by Wikipedia:Be_bold. But I won't repeat it: turns out, the ref won't open in a particular mobile browser, yet the link is OK. Since you suspect me of going disruptive, I will avoid the article itself whatsoever instead. Uchyotka (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Vanishing

Hello. Did you request to be vanished from Wikipedia? If so, why are you still editing? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)