Userbrn
Welcome! edit
|
Speedy deletion nomination of The Wisconsin Engineer edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Wisconsin Engineer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Userbrn, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Userbrn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Userbrn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.All cryptocurrency related content you insert must be backed by reliable sources. Cryptocurrency enthusiast sites are not reliable sources. MER-C 18:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi MER-C, I was hoping you could clarify two things for me. The first of which is about the location of my draft. Right now, I am working on my article on 0xBitcoin under the user:Userbrn page. Should I be working on it on the draft page or can I continue working here? The second question I had was regarding the conflict of interest. I would say that I am a community member (active in the Discord channel and subreddit) and I also hold the cryptocurrency personally. Does my involvement as a community member warrant disclosure? The reason I ask is because 0xBitcoin is entirely community based, having no core development team unlike the vast majority of ERC20 tokens on Ethereum; it is a decentralized project that anyway can build on top of without permission. I obviously am aware that holding the cryptocurrency warrants a disclosure. Let me know how you suggest I proceed! Userbrn (talk) 19:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- I bring this up because I am not confident that by the time my article is finished it will be considered noteworthy, so I would like the have the option to keep it as a work in progress and communicate with community editors over the next few months to determine if and when it achieves that status. I'm hoping to respect the special guidelines on cryptocurrencies and avoid the impression that I'm pushing something through as an advertisement. Userbrn (talk) 19:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- The holding of cryptocurrencies is the key one to disclose and should be enough, unless you're also being paid to market the token. You can have as much time to develop the draft, but given the very low tolerance to new cryptocurrency articles I cannot guarantee that it won't get deleted. The probability of deletion rises significantly if submitted. You prove noteworthiness by showing that reputable publications have significantly covered this token on its own merits (such as full articles in mainstream financial media). MER-C 14:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, sounds good; I'm not being paid to market the token. Are you saying it's possible that even on my User page it would get deleted, without me moving it into the main site? Is there a better place to work on a draft, perhaps? Userbrn (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes: they are publicly visible, though very much out of the way. I delete many unsubmitted, very promotional drafts every day. The safest place is, of course, keeping a local copy on your computer. MER-C 08:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, sounds good; I'm not being paid to market the token. Are you saying it's possible that even on my User page it would get deleted, without me moving it into the main site? Is there a better place to work on a draft, perhaps? Userbrn (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- The holding of cryptocurrencies is the key one to disclose and should be enough, unless you're also being paid to market the token. You can have as much time to develop the draft, but given the very low tolerance to new cryptocurrency articles I cannot guarantee that it won't get deleted. The probability of deletion rises significantly if submitted. You prove noteworthiness by showing that reputable publications have significantly covered this token on its own merits (such as full articles in mainstream financial media). MER-C 14:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- I bring this up because I am not confident that by the time my article is finished it will be considered noteworthy, so I would like the have the option to keep it as a work in progress and communicate with community editors over the next few months to determine if and when it achieves that status. I'm hoping to respect the special guidelines on cryptocurrencies and avoid the impression that I'm pushing something through as an advertisement. Userbrn (talk) 19:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)