Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

TraditionalCow, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi TraditionalCow! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TraditionalCow (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

How many do I need? Because I added three TV shows that can all be verified, and state everything that is written up. TraditionalCow (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, TraditionalCow. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by gwickwire | Leave a message 04:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KAT-TUN no Sekaiichi Dame na Yoru!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KAT-TUN no Sekaiichi Dame na Yoru!

edit
 

Hello TraditionalCow. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "KAT-TUN no Sekaiichi Dame na Yoru!".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KAT-TUN no Sekaiichi Dame na Yoru!}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply