Tim Pencil

Welcome! edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Tim Pencil! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DrowssapSMM (talk) 23:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy John (author) (March 9) edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy John (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Tim Pencil! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

thanks, i think i fixed the citation. sorry for the hassle. this is my first attempt at creating an article. Tim Pencil (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy John (author) (June 25) edit

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to show independent coverage of either John himself or his stories (eg reviews in major newspapers, academic studies, etc).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy John (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

thanks for the clarification.

is this article from the CBC (canadian news organization) sufficient?

https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-84-up-north/clip/15940441-jeremy-john-back-time-ghost-stories

or this one listen the writer as a quest speaker at the Wordstock Literary festival (page 23)

https://wordstocksudbury.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Program-Guide_11_04_2021.pdf 184.146.74.56 (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jeremy John (author) edit

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Tim Pencil. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeremy John (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic