Amherst Island edit

It's nothing to do with Candian and British English, it's about Wikipedia's Manual of Style. There is long-standing agreement that plain english words should not be linked (WP:OVERLINK), section headers shouldn't be capitalised (WP:SECTIONCAPS), bold text should only be used in a few specific circumstances (MOS:BOLD), and external links (to websites outside Wikipedia) shouldn't be placed in the body of an article (point 2 of WP:ELPOINTS). If you want to contribute to Wikipedia, you need to familiarise yourself with these pages. I don't want to sound antagonistic, but continuing to ignore these guidelines will be seen as disruptive behaviour. If you disagree with the rules, you can discuss them here, but for now you're expected to abide by them. I've brought the page back in line with the MOS, and I'd advise you not to revert my changes again without a very good reason. DoctorKubla (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Overlinking and underlinking

What generally should be linked

Shortcut: WP:UNDERLINK

An article is said to be underlinked if words are not linked that are needed to aid understanding of the article. In general, links should be created to: relevant connections to the subject of another article that will help readers understand the article more fully (see the example below). This can include people, events and topics that already have an article or that clearly deserve one, so long as the link is relevant to the article in question.

archipelago is not commonly understood word in english. it is an academic word and hamlet is not a readily understood word either in english and since this a canadian topic and i write in british english i go by what is a commonly understoood word in british english and by what the grade 3 children at the amherst island public school can read. wikipedia is as i re-call to be a source of quality infomation for all ages .

As for bolding it is to remind what needed to be worked on next. but i will refrain from this my apologies. As for links I don't know how to put them as as a cited reference so I put them in the main body of the work trusting someone else with more skill can finish what I started - after-all this wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thechristiancontender (talkcontribs)

I can see where you're coming from with archipelago and hamlet, but words like island and ferry don't need to be linked. External links, like to CJAI-FM's website, are normally kept in the "External links" section at the bottom of the page. To cite a source, just put the url inside ref tags, like:
The toll ferry operates between Millhaven and Stella.<ref>http://www.amherstisland.on.ca/ferry.htm</ref>
There's more guidance at WP:CITE. Sorry for being a bit terse yesterday, I was in a bad mood. :) Feel free to ask me if you need any more help with anything. (Oh, and don't forget to sign your comments with ~~~~.) DoctorKubla (talk) 07:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive edit

EdwardsBot (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification edit

Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project WikifyReply

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive edit

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lindisfarne National Nature Reserve edit

Hello Thechristiancontender,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lindisfarne National Nature Reserve for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reasoning edit

I nominated this page because its a copy paste of the info from Lindisfarne. I would suggest that if you want to create a separate article do so in your Sandbox. Add the extra info, infobox and references and then publish it. Gbawden (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou. Have a great day coming. Thechristiancontender (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Thechristiancontender. You have new messages at Gbawden's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Infoboxes edit

An infobox is a box summarizing key points about the subject. Have a look at WP:IBT. I have added the correct infobox to the page, you just need to fill in the information.

February 2013 Wikification Drive edit

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

WikiProject Wikify April Drive edit

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.Reply

Lead in Nantucket edit

Hi Thechristiancontender, Thank you for your interest in Nantucket where I see that you have made some additions to the lead section. My earlier reversal was more that the entry did not, in the words of MOS:LEAD, contribute to the lead being "able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources, and the notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences." Since the reference to the island's highpoint is covered under geography and does not contribute to an overview of the article, I suggest that it shouldn't be in the lead. Your reference is a welcome addition to the geographical section, however. Bear in mind that WP is really looking for references that base "articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." (See WP:REF.) So, thank you, again for your interest in Wikipedia and Nantucket. (I'll watch this page for any response that you may wish to offer.) Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 12:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 Wikification Drive edit

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive edit

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sidney Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 Wikification Drive edit

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2015 Wikification drive edit

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 Wikification drive. edit

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015 Wikification drive. edit

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge edit

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Thechristiancontender. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada edit

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Thechristiancontender. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bruce Owen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

It not only was constructive - it was an absolute necessity. Bruce Owen has died. He was a public figure. I added the required info to let people whom read the page about Bruce Owen have the most up to date and accurate info. Thechristiancontender (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your edits. Please note that references are needed, too. Thanks, again. --PFHLai (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Bruce Owen edit

On 11 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bruce Owen, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply