TheKman811
Welcome
edit
|
February 2012
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Len Bias, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Len Bias was changed by TheKman811 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-02-27T13:39:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Len Bias page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Yankees76 Talk 14:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
February 2013
editHello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Partnership, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 15:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Limited liability company with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Torreslfchero (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Limited liability company with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Torreslfchero (talk) 15:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Waterford Commons for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waterford Commons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford Commons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —JJBers 17:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)