Sushilxxx

Proposed deletion of Rajja Rani

The article Rajja Rani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:37, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Rohit Kumar (cricketer)

Hi. Please stop re-adding non-free images to articles. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

For images, YOU must hold the copyright for that picture. You CAN NOT take it from another website and claim it as your own. Basically, unless you've taken the picture yourself, you MUST NOT upload here (or to Commons). If you continue to do this, it will be viewed as disruption and can lead to your account being blocked. Please reply here to state you understand this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop re-adding the same, non-free image, that you've obviously taken from another website. Please reply here to state you understand this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Rohit Kumar Paudel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rohit Kumar Paudel.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Rohit Kumar Paudel.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Romeo & Muna

Hello, Sushilxxx,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Romeo & Muna should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romeo & Muna .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Dom from Paris (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official poster of romeo & muna.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Kasle Choryo Mero Man.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official Poster of Ke Ma Timro Sathi Banna Sakchhu.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Romeo & Muna.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official poster of movie.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official poster of romeo & muna.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official poster of romeo & muna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kahi Katai

The article Kahi Katai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON: an upcoming film with no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kasle Choryo Mero Man

The article Kasle Choryo Mero Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaryan Adhikari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aaryan Adhikari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Butterfly (colors of love)

The article Butterfly (colors of love) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Nepalese films

Please note that you are not allowed to add films to redlinked categories that do not exist. Our category for films from Nepal is located at Category:Nepalese films, not "Nepali Film" or "Nepali Movie", so you must add the article to the category that exists and not the ones that don't. As well, the singular category "Film" is for very general aspects of the concept of film, not for individual films — individual films get subcategorized by year and nationality and genre, and are not placed directly in "Film".

The correct categories for the film articles you've been creating are "[Year] film" for the year in which the film was released, and Category:Nepalese films. Do not add a film to any other category, neither "Film" nor a redlinked category that doesn't even exist. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official Poster of movie kahi katai.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Official poster of romeo & muna.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Official poster of romeo & muna.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 03:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sushilxxx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As i was new in wikipedia i was not aware of proper rule of wikipedia policy but now i am perfect for contribution thats why please unblock my account , Thankyou. As i previously mention i donot break down any policy of wikipedia , yes i multiple account but sushilxxx is my old account very old account then i forget login details , then i create sushil.lax to contribute in articles but suddenly when i login instead of sushil.lax i put sushil.xxx with same password as its work but i didnt notice about user id and continue editing then i get notice from gss that i am using multiple account but i am just using this user id only before notice because i get my orignal account , please unblock me as i am contributor from nepal .yes pleae delete my another account from server as i will use only this account . i hope u under stand .thankyou Sushilxxx (talk) 04:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Taken from your statement below "we are pr agency we are hired by salary per month for all public figure manage", " we are pr agency in nepal u even donot know we manage more than 500 facebook & twitter account of public figure verified by twiiter or facebook". No. You are NOT to use Wikipedia to promote your clients. I'm declining this request and revoking talk page access, as it is abundantly clear your are here sole to promote your clients. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You don't need two separate unblock requests, so I have merged them into one. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

• Question for Sushilxxx: I have some questions but first if you don't mind can you please disclose if you get paid for the articles you create or edit? because your contribution seems a bit suspicious. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:58, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

My contributions is only for my country, I am helping to create articles or edit for my country's actor, cricketer, politician, Actress, movie or other stub article. Taking any penny from any one is not a policy of wikipedia or our country . thankyou

• These accounts were active at the same time and both created the same article. I checked both your contributions and deleted contributions before blocking. TonyBallioni (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

• As i already mention it was a login issue ... you can check that no other articles are written after it . i understand a policy if you want me to exist from wikipedia then its ok i will leave wikipedia forever because i dnt have any creative idea. If i doing any work against policy then i should be more creative , i know there is also ip adress , mac address system too. you can decide remain blcok or unblock .. if you unblock me i will write all old or new moives's articles . i love to write articles about film, cricketer , notable actor as per wikipedia policy with all reliable sources
  • Within a two hour period on the same day? Also creating the same article using two different accounts? TonyBallioni (talk) 13:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

As i already mention it was login issue ... as i have old account as sushilxxx but i have created news one sushil.lax .... I was writing articles but suddenly i have close my system and when it open id was log out that time then i log in with old id, i dnt check user name start continue , i dnt think so it was against policy as i am not deleting any notice from wikipedia using multiple accounts. Simply i was writing articles, As my id was blocked i am leaving wikipedia . Please donot unblock my account .. As i am fighting here thats mean i am right ,,,, If i was wrong i can do other trick to contribute and i can promise u cant find any thing else .... but i am just contributing for country articles as there is lots of stub articles or not create any thing for movies or actor or cricketer ... but it is ok .. i also mention my company name in the talk page ...with link and details that we are contributor from nepal. This details for all user in wikipedia but i dnt know that here is also politcs wow ,,, just wow wow .... ok bye boss have a good day , please donot comment any thing now ... i dnt wikipedia admin or woner or other to unblock my id or account . i dnt think wikipedia is for nepal. its only for country like india or usa or ther countries .... thanks tony or thanks mr, GSS

• @Sushilxxx: Alright so in your comment above you said My contributions is only for my country, I am helping to create articles or edit for my country's actor.. but as per your user page you are working for "Hawk Nepal" a company based in Nepal that provides paid digital marketing services including article creation on Wikipedia. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

@GSS I know you have check my talk page yes i have tag my company page with website link that wikipedia should know about contributor of nepal. We are web development company or digital marketing company from nepal it doesnot means we are getting paid for it. Please post here if you are finding any post of articles that show we are getting paid , wikipedia is not like a fb or social networking site that every one can contribute it even we are new here , I donot know we are doing any crime here posting about articles. We are all transparent about all service. If we are creating articles for money or other thing trust me u cant find any one like that, We are just contributing it means we are transparent, You can check both ids creation date and contribution about that , You can blocked if i was using that id too to delete notice or any other. You can block me here yes i am existing from wikipedia ... you can stop me but other citizen to contribute thankyou. I am contributing but you are deleting articles tag as not a reliable sources , Nepal has thier own news portal like onlinekhabar.com but i think it might be reliable sources as all page are verfied by facebook or twitter. Any one no comment for any thing i cant waste my time on discussing because admin of wikipedia really rude, Yes you can delete my all artcles but please check all references link once, Thanks ....................

Are you serious? also this post from your official Facebook page (Hawk Nepal) confirm that you provide Wikipedia services including PR, brand promotion etc. so please don't tell me you provide all these services for free and the reason for proposing your articles for deletion is very simple as none of them meets the notability standard for films. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

there is written Are you a Celebrity, Sports Person or Public Figure ? Get your Own Offical Website , Wikipedia Page, Public Relation or Brand Promotion by Hawk Nepal 🇳🇵️ it means are you celebrity or public who cant manage thier public figure doesnot mean i am spamming here .... alright ... every one have right if they are public figure to get notice on wikipedia if they are notable celebrity or public figure ... there is no mention of non notable person or any other charges ????????????????????????????????? every thing open to all from my 1st articles that i am contributor as every one cant contribute by there self as they even dont know how to edit .... i am just helping to contribute .. i dnt think so shah rukh khan or salman khan , president trump or hollywood celebrities manage thier wikpedia by thier self they all have thier own manager or pr agency who manage it .... you will not understand my words but think about it ..... we are pr agency in nepal u even donot know we manage more than 500 facebook & twitter account of public figure verified by twiiter or facebook ... it doesnot mean facebook will delete thier blue badge . once again i am telling you i dnt want my account unblock but i am very transparent from 1st articles ..... i am giving my link also ... noone can search that if i am promoting my self , public figure like priyanka karki, prime minsiter of nepal, rajesh hamal or 20000 artiles managed by my team .... u cant delete all articles. u can investigate all articles u will not find any thing spamming ,,, we are pr agency we are hired by salary per month for all public figure manage .... we are not involve in any thing .... we are team of 100 people managing 2000 articles for nepal as NON Profit Business. ALl have their own account and given them 20 articles to each to manage. We just create articles but wikipedia decide to delete or not as we create all submit all reference link ...... thanks

Proposed deletion of K Ma Timro Sathi Banna Sakchhu

The article K Ma Timro Sathi Banna Sakchhu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFF or WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Karma

The article The Karma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFF or WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Poster of movie kahi katai.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Poster of movie kahi katai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kasle Choryo Mero Man.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kasle Choryo Mero Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Poster of Ke Ma Timro Sathi Banna Sakchhu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Poster of Ke Ma Timro Sathi Banna Sakchhu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official poster of movie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official poster of movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Romeo & Muna.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Romeo & Muna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)