Susan.p.ashdown, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi Susan.p.ashdown! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Susan Margaret Watkins (May 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Susan.p.ashdown. You have new messages at BethNaught's talk page.
Message added 15:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Margaret Watkins (April 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bradv 04:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Margaret Watkins has been accepted edit

 
Susan Margaret Watkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
It very clearly shows notability under WP:PROF, on the basis of the honorary degree, and the textbooks, and possibly othr criteria The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. It does need improvement, as the previous reviewers have commented--specific sources are needed, links to other WP articles are needed. But it should never have been rejected for not meeting the MOS--these are things that can be fixed later.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. {{#if:

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply