This user may have left Wikipedia. Stephen's black friend has not edited Wikipedia since December 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, Stephen's black friend, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Regarding Saved by the Bell, Tori Spelling's character is just as "recurring" as the two yo bring up, and Tori Spelling's character Violet is not mentioned in the "Characters section". The fact that the then-unknown Spelling was on the show is mentioned in the trivia, and if you wanted to mention then-unknown (fairly) Leah Remini (sp) in the same trivia comment, I don't see a problem with that. Otherwise, Leon is just a 5-episode character, no more prominent than Zack's Dad, or Mr. Tuttle or other recurring characers. Tori and Max were both full cast members in the title credits of over a dozen episodes each. The Beach episodes are virtually identical to the tv-movies (hawaii and vegas - each of which has been broken down to four episodes for syndication vs. the five beach shows - the characters like Kelly's uncle or the bellhop from those two films certainly don't merit mention for their roles in two hours of SBTB.) I understand that he was an authority figure in those episodes, and thus "is the equivilant of" Mr. Belding only in that he's the authority figure, but it's only in 5 episodes out of a series of almost 90 seems inconsequential. There's also the 2-episode Xmas set with the homeless man and his daughter. That one takes place outside of the school and perhaps the authority figure is the Storeowner (Mr. Moody)... but he certainly doesn't need a mention. Anyone who watches a beach episode should immediately understand that Leon is their boss. If anything should be mentioned about the Beach shows, it's that they exist at all, which wouldn't belong in the Character section. You could mention the 5-episode arc in a trivia note, but to me a short span of 5 eps is nothig more than trivia - not a fundamental part of the series like Max and Tori were for many episodes. TheHYPO 07:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you added to December 27, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. The article that you edited has notability guidelines for the addition of birthdays and deaths to the list. Refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Days of the year for details on what are acceptable entries in Wikicalendar articles. Thank you. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 16:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Abce2|Howdy! 00:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Elissa Sursara. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not delete article content as you did at Elissa Sursara. If you have concerns with the article, please discuss them on the talk page of the article. florrie 11:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Eliska Sursova. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. --Allen3talk 12:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Stephen's black friend! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 905 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nichole Galicia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arxiloxos (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Abce2|Howdy! 00:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
