Staceybridget
This is Staceybridget's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Unitarian Church of South Australia has been accepted
editYou are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcella Walker McGee has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Allen McGee has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The Drover's Wife (talk) 20:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Note
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Your edits over the last day or so have effectively completely rewritten the article on aromatherapy, a pseudomedical intervention, from a point of view supportive of practitioners. At the very least this requires prior discussion at talk:aromatherapy. Our terms of use also require you to declare if you are financially connected to the subject (e.g. as a practitioner). Guy (help!) 07:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Editing your own comments
editHi Staceybridget. I appreciate how you edited your own comments as you did, but in general comments should not be modified after someone has responded to them, but should be clearly redacted instead. See WP:REDACT for how to indicate such changes. --Ronz (talk) 23:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)