Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanhu Charan Patro (April 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is not the place to post a CV.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Soniya Gtr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kanhu Charan Patro

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kanhu Charan Patro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comment

edit

I saw your request at help desk.

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

  • When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • Your text was entirely unsourced apart fom two links (not in line) to his own hospital, which is not an independent third-party source
  • we can't establish notability as defined above if we can't verify what you have written
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • It's full of promo eg A Noble Soul, a Clear Goal [sic],... he inspires with his dedication by showing equality of treatment without any discrimination. A true worrior, [sic] who fights against cancer with the patients showing patience for better results at every stage... With a passion for Cancer Care, he shares his knowledge with love and flair. Dispelling myths and misconceptions, he serves with a deep sense of devotion. You also bold his name every time
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • Your text is full of links to his writings
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
  • I didn't check, but text mostly created in a single edit without any references or wikilinks looks suspicious

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanhu Charan Patro (April 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requesting for unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soniya Gtr (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm new to wikipedia. I recently created my 1st article, which is deleted by some flaws. Later I changed the content according the norms of wikipedia and posted it and it got approved with a limitation of reference check and given time to recheck. Suddenly I got blocked as a user. I know I'm new to it and maybe made some flaws. I just need chance to recollect the mistake and make a perfect article for Wikipedia. I'm choosing this face as career. So please unblock my ID and I I'll try not to repeat those actions which lead to block my id and rectify the flaws made by me. So please unblock by id Soniya Gtr (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

We aren't interested in you writing promotional articles for pay. Yamla (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.