AfC notification: Draft:Antares Vision Group has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Antares Vision Group. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 11:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antares Vision Group (October 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Snezhii! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Antares Vision Group has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Antares Vision Group. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello Snezhii. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Snezhii. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Snezhii|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Theroadislong! Thank you for your feedback. I am actually trying to help a friend who did not have experience with Wikipedia and wanted to put this page together. I understand your concerns about the content being promotional and I am happy to modify that if needed. Please let me know. Snezhii (talk) 10:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The content of the encyclopedia is called articles, not the broader "pages". What you describe is still a conflict of interest which you must disclose, see WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 12:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the clarification on the "articles" term. What do I need to disclose and what are the next steps? Snezhii (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please see WP:COI which explains the disclosure procedure to disclose your conflict of interest. If you find the coding too challenging, you may just write a statement on your user page(User:Snezhii) to to the effect of "I am disclosing a conflict of interest with regards to Antares Vision Group". 331dot (talk) 15:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I did place the statement on my User page. How shall we proceed now? Is there anything further that I need to provide? What is the procedure in this case?
Thank you in advance! Snezhii (talk) 14:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
What you have put is sufficient. 331dot (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot for your guidance. Do you know if there's a timeline on when the article will be reviewed/approved? Snezhii (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antares Vision Group (November 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antares Vision Group (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antares Vision Group (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antares Vision Group (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Antares Vision Group

edit

  Hello, Snezhii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antares Vision Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply