March 2021 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to B unit have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: B unit was changed by Shiner1037 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959796 on 2021-03-17T13:31:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skysass, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Owlf (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

ČD Class 843 moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, ČD Class 843, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [utc] 15:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ČD Class 843 moved to draftspace - unsourced edit

An article you recently created, ČD Class 843, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unfinished drafts edit

Hi, you now have the same article published twice, in both cases unreferenced, and therefore moved to drafts twice. Please do not create any more copies. Work on one of existing drafts instead, and submit it to AfC when it's ready for publishing, most importantly when it has sufficient sources and citations to establish the notability of the subject and support the article contents. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Trcuk" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trcuk. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 17#Trcuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 01:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Baketsball" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Baketsball. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 17#Baketsball until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 01:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Moues" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Moues. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 17#Moues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 01:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Bakset" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bakset. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26#Bakset until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 22:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Automated tool edit

What automated tool are you using to categorise redirects? You do not use edit summaries and there are no tags showing which tool you are using. dudhhrContribs 16:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Deb (talk) 07:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please read and respond to the above messages about automated editing and edit summaries. Deb (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unfortunately you have failed to respond to the messages from myself and others, and this has resulted in a longer block. If you continue to carry out apparent automated editing and failure to respond to warnings, an indefinite block will be imposed. Deb (talk) 07:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shiner1037 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Due to busy cleaning up and reason for the edit because viewed and copy the page, despite it is not a vandalism and a related one

Decline reason:

This is completely incoherent. Yamla (talk) 10:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have read your unblock request 5 times now and am no closer to understanding it. I will leave this to another admin. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

While we're on the topic of understanding things: Shiner, could you please explain why you created User:158.140.187.217 a week after that IP address had been blocked, and why what you put there was a copy of WJBscribe's retirement statement? -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 10:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Looking further, there's a pretty extensive contribution overlap between that IP and this account: Shared interest in things like TransJakarta Corridors, ČD Class 242, and Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz. Arguable good hand / bad hand behavior at Main Pages. Admins may want to look into whether this is block evasion. Pinging ToBeFree, who blocked the IP. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 10:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for the ping. The block is now indefinite, and I'd like to see some answers to the concerns voiced above. 158.140.187.217 was blocked for clear vandalism, redirecting "T" to 6 multiple times. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Answer: Edit source template copy & paste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiner1037 (talkcontribs) 07:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:ČD Class 843 edit

  Hello, Shiner1037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ČD Class 843, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:ČD Class 843 edit

 

Hello, Shiner1037. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ČD Class 843".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:ČD Class 843 b edit

  Hello, Shiner1037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ČD Class 843 b, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:ČD Class 843 b edit

 

Hello, Shiner1037. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ČD Class 843 b".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Read the standing orders! Read them and understand them!" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Read the standing orders! Read them and understand them! and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 23#Read the standing orders! Read them and understand them! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Bobux" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bobux and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 3#Bobux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 03:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Perry the Platypus?!" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Perry the Platypus?! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 21 § Perry the Platypus?! until a consensus is reached. ~ F4U (talkthey/it) 20:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"A platypus plumber?" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect A platypus plumber? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § A platypus plumber? until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention!" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Perry the Platypus Plumber" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Perry the Platypus Plumber has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 21 § Perry the Platypus Plumber until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Perry the Platypus Plumber?" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Perry the Platypus Plumber? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 21 § Perry the Platypus Plumber? until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

"A Platypus?" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect A Platypus? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30 § A Platypus? until a consensus is reached. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BCC1:74D:C5C8:CF76 (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Doofenshmirtz the pharmacist" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Doofenshmirtz the pharmacist has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 7 § Doofenshmirtz the pharmacist until a consensus is reached. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply