Welcome!

Hello, Shade Ruff! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Referencing

edit

Unless the DA Pamphlet actually mentions Garlin Murl Conner, saying that he participated in every action resulting in a battle star doesn't make the cut for reliability.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 16:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ianswered your note to me right below it; I like to keep everything topgether. BTW, you may notice that "Conner" is sometimes rendered as "Connor." <sigh>--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 17:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Shade Ruff! I see you have been making many edits on the Conner page. So, I hope you will also take a look at the Conner talk page, if you haven't already. I have posted some of my research there with a proposal to change part of his medal count to what I believe is the correct level of 1 BSM and 3 PHs. I do have copies of some of his actual Army records which show this to be true. Unfortunately, personally held information cannot be used as a source on WP. The only sources that can be used on WP must be published and verifiable. The trick is to work within those limits and find the correct information. Even if a member of Conner's family showed up and posted, it wouldn't be considered usable unless it was also found in reliable source approved by the WP rules. It's a challenge, but the nature of the WP requires it and I understand that. Fortunately, I have found a published article that also confirms my information. Roam41 (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi again. The craziest thing about Wikipedia is learning formatting. I still have so much trouble with it. The first day I was here, I accidentally blanked an entire page. I know you are new, so I'd just like to make two suggestions. When replying on talk pages, don't indent your text on the editing page like you would a letter. You're indenting and that's why your posts are coming out as block quotes and look so different from the rest of the page. It's considered proper to indent if you are replying to someone's post, but you do it by putting a colon first then the text. If you want to indent 2 spaces, then 2 colons and so on. It will look funny on the editing page, but will show up fine on the talk page. Next thing, it is very important to sign your posts on talk pages. You don't have to do this on the main pages. You do this by putting four tildes at the end of your post like this ~. I had to put 1 there or it would have signed my name, so you would have to add 3 more. Again the tildes will disappear and your name and timestamp will appear on the saved page. I hope this helps! Roam41 (talk) 22:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Roam41

Thank you for the pointers. I've used them to clean up my entries on the Conner talk page as well as on Jim's talk page.

Regards,

Shade Ruff (talk) 23:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ribbon racks

edit

Please take a look at MOS:ICON. While you can find biographical articles with ribbon racks, that's not a norm here. Please try writing prose for that data. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Shade Ruff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A beer for you!

edit
  Thanks for editing on William Shemin article Cefaro (talk) 23:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Photo request petition - please sign

edit

Hi! Can you please sign the petition to TASS and RIAN requesting them to release certain historic photos (many of them from WWII) for Wikimedia by adding your signature to the signature section? Also, please do spread the word to other Wikipedians. Thanks, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Shade Ruff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply