SebastianAreI
Welcome edit
|
Proposed deletion of History In the Making, Vol. 1 edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article History In the Making, Vol. 1, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 18:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of Hate Is The New Love edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hate Is The New Love, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hate Is The New Love is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hate Is The New Love, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of A Kid Named Cudi edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Kid Named Cudi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable mixtape with little or no substantial media coverage. Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 21:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
December 2008 edit
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lupe Fiasco, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mfield (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Apology edit
I am SO SORRY I blocked you! I really wasn't paying attention. J.delanoygabsadds 02:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
It's alright, I was confused for a minute because I didn't think I did anything wrong, let alone get me blocked. I got unblocked right away so no worries. SebastianAreI (talk) 02:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know I basically reverted your Have One On Me edits having to do with capitalization. I know the title of the album and songs are not grammatically correct, but that's how they list them on the website. I just want to avoid warring. Here's the link to the website: http://www.dragcity.com/products/have-one-on-me -Specialk22 (talk) 19:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Antarctica (The Secret Handshake album) for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antarctica (The Secret Handshake album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antarctica (The Secret Handshake album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 19:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)