Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquilent (February 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: In particular, "Top workplace" is not a distinction that shows notability of the company, but much more in the nature of PR. "Fastest rowing" is usually an equivalent to "not yet notable" . I recognize the difficulty of fining good sources for companies such as this, but perhaps you can find something more substantial. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Rpurdy2132, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Aquilent has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aquilent. Thanks! 333-blue 13:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquilent (April 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 12:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquilent (May 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Aquilent

edit
 

Hello, Rpurdy2132. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Aquilent".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 21:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply