Welcome!

Hello, Robfergusonjr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Shanes 00:39, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

ty for the welcome.


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BobAndDolly.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BobAndDolly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Chunky Creek Train Wreck of 1863 edit

You need to do more to paraphrase the words taken from your two source articles. At the moment the article hovers precipitously close to being a copyright violation. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

All do more to paraphrase the source ... I just created the stub article for the sake of having the knowledge itself available. Rob (talk)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/robfergusonjr edit

Have added more questions. cheers, and happy editing!Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 22:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks! Rob (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Martha Masters edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Martha Masters, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.marthamasters.com/biography.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I addressed this problem and added citations. Rob (talk) 16:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Choctaw edit

Hey Rob, sorry to have been so picky with Choctaw, it really is quite well done. I hope I haven't disillusioned you by leaving that ton of comments, it really is mostly small, easy-to-fix stuff, and most of it's not that important anyway. Definitely drop me a note if you need anything or if I can be of any help, I do hope you'll re-nominate it after dealing with the major stuff I brought up. Peace, delldot on a public computer talk 02:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the input delldot ... I needed others to check out its viability. Rob (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reservation Blues edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Reservation Blues, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hachettebookgroupusa.com/books/19/0446672351/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I addressed this problem and added citations. Rob (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


P. Romer "A Choctaw Belle" Painting edit

Hi Rob, I'm really intrigued by the painting you posted on the Choctaw page. Can you give me more information about it? I would really like to find a print of this painting somewhere. My email address is: terrimwilliams@yahoo.com Thanks! Terrimwilliams (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Choctaw Belle was painted by P. Romer in 1850. Apparently it is keep in D.C. at the Inventories of American Painting and Sculpture, Smithsonian American Art Museum, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 970, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012
More info:
For additional information see article in Alabama Heritage (Winter 1996): pg. 39.
http://siris-artinventories.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?uri=full=3100001~!381805!0#focus


Image copyright problem with Image:Doaks-Stand.png edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Doaks-Stand.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Doaks-Stand.png is self made and I release it to public domain. Rob (talk) 14:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Treaty of Fort St. Stephens edit

 

A tag has been placed on Treaty of Fort St. Stephens, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

*Please don't create single-sentence articles. If you'd like to create a stub, please read WP:STUB to learn what the minimum content should be. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for expanding these. I see what you had in mind. Sorry to bother you.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll expanded it more before before creating a single sentence article. Rob (talk) 15:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Treaty of Mount Dexter edit

I see you are more than capable of continuing with this (and your other) artilces, I will leave you to it. Carry on the good work. --Triwbe (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll expanded it more before before creating a single sentence article. Rob (talk) 15:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem with the single sentence artice for me, it could have been contested on notability, but there was enough info (the name) for a simple web search to show it was a good candidate. --Triwbe (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Trail of Tears edit

I see you've done a lot of work separating the Cherokee Trail of Tears from the Trail of Tears. There is a difference in the dates for Cherokee removal between the first paragraph, which I think you added, and the Cherokee section further down the page. Since they are in a nice sequential order in the first paragraph I didn't edit them. However the 1838 date is well considered the correct date for the Cherokee removal. Odestiny (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have checked my resources and 1838 is the year when U.S. General Winfield Scott send about 7000 troops to remove the Cherokee. I'll indicated that year in the introduction.

Chickasaw additions edit

Thanks for adding a table about the Chickasaw treaties. It's good information, and it improves the article. However, we'll need to know your sources. Where did you find the information to make the table? Thanks! -kotra (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have added citations to the Chickasaw treaty section. Rob (talk) 14:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! -kotra (talk) 20:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gallery of Native Americans with facial hair edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gallery of Native Americans with facial hair, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 19:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have added sources to justify the article's validity to remain as a source for all to use as it is indeed a rare subject. Rob (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Gallery of Native Americans with facial hair edit

I have nominated Gallery of Native Americans with facial hair, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Native Americans with facial hair. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Commons edit

 

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 22:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Holmes Colbert edit

Just letting you know I removed some sections of Holmes Colbert that, when present, made the article look like it was half-complete and abandoned. In general, biographical entries for people of minor notability do not have detailed family histories, and what history they do have takes up only a small portion of the article.

The Colbert's have major notability with the Chickasaw Nation. It is important to have Native American historical detail which is often overlooked and ignored. This information needs to be accessible. Information Systems, like Wikipedia, are no longer constrained by space as printed encyclopedias-- I don't see why this would be a problem. 14:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
The issue was it made the article look awkward and it does not match its title. It would be like having an article about Bill Clinton with 1 line saying he was President from 1993-2001, a paragraph about his ancestry and upbringing, and little else. If the content is to be restored, the article needs to be greatly expanded so the most encyclopedic things about this person represent the bulk of the article. On the other hand, if the article were renamed "The Colbert Family (Chickasaw Nation)" then it would be fair to make the bulk of the article about the family rather than the man. However, you would need to establish the notability of the family as a whole or a significant number of its members and make sure you used reliable sources to back up all claims. You might consider merging this article into Chickasaw#The Colbert Legacy (1800s). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 17:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I created that Chickasaw subsection (Chickasaw#The Colbert Legacy (1800s)) and was expanding it into articles like Colbert Holmes and later Winchester Holmes. The deleted section was intended to be a background of his family relating to the significance to the Chickasaw and the Chickasaw Nation. If there were no Colberts there probably wouldn't be a Chickasaw Nation as it is today. The article is a work-in-progress. As a historian and regular user of Wikipedia I'm well aware of the importance of reliable sources. Creating a Colbert Family article maybe appropriate in this case though which I'll research. Respectively, Rob (talk) 18:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
It wasn't clear that the article was "in progress" - it looked abandoned. One technique I've seen done, and used myself, is to draft articles in "user space" like User:Robfergusonjr/Colbert Holmes then move them to the main article space when they are at least C-class or better yet, B-class. In many cases a clearly-written stub is more valuable than start-class article. A start-class article can leave the reader confused over the relative importance of the various parts of the article, which was my major complaint with the Colbert Holmes article. I look forward to a balanced article, section of another article, or even articles that highlight the importance of this family in history. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of US Marines edit

The "List of US Marines" is for those who have gained fame through previous or subsequent endeavors, infamy, or successes and not for those who gained fame as members of the Marine Corps. Therefore, Ira Hayes ahas been placed in the "List of historically important U.S. Marines".

Please follow the "rules" when adding names, which clearly state: "When adding a name to this list, please place the same in alphabetical order and provide a reliable verifiable source. Secondary sources such as fansites are not allowed. As a guide please see: sources. Additions that are not in alphabetical order and/or do not provide a primary reliable verifiable source will be removed." Tony the Marine (talk) 22:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Certain term usage edit

To say that Jessica Biel CLAIMS Choctaw heritage is to say that there is doubt. That makes it seem like she is a liar or her heritage is questioned. There seems to be a standard that people that are of partial heritage are questioned. That's why I say it should be changed from claims to is of. It's more clear and claim means that there is doubt that a situation is not true.Mcelite (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Famous Muscogees edit

Whoops! You are completely right about the date of Will Sampson's death. Thanks for catching my error. Cheers, Uyvsdi (talk) 01:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)UyvsdiReply

  • No problem ... we all make errors from time to time. Rob (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Early Tennessee history edit

It is not appropriate to add the same generic content about early Tennessee history to numerous articles on specific city's histories. Please feel free to integrate that content to History of Tennessee (where it most logically belongs) and to add any information specific to those cities to their respective articles. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay, no problem. Rob (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

re Choctaw GA review edit

Yes - a GA candidate should not have anything unsourced in it. That is essentially a criteria for a quick-fail. Cirt (talk) 03:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lots - if you like I could add {{fact}} tags to the article to show you. Cirt (talk) 13:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Thanks so much for the barnstar! I felt like a jerk for being so picky with that review. Best of luck with the article! Peace, delldot ∇. 14:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:James Monroe.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:James Monroe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Gallery of Choctaw Native Americans edit

I have nominated Gallery of Choctaw Native Americans, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Choctaw Native Americans. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. fetch·comms 23:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

OK then edit

So you just donT care i guess..wont even talk as requested.
So i guess we will go in this direction..Next time try talking.!!

Moxy (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Crime against Jordan Gruver edit

Please read my removal edit summary before re-adding. This crime is irrelevant to this article. --CliffC (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cherokee Confederacy Pic edit

That was a nice pic you put up in the Civil War article. where did you find it?Mcelite (talk) 22:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • A random find on Google images. Rob (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cowboy edit

Just an FYI that I kept some of your material, but had moved it to another spot where it was already mentioned and more appropriately placed. I also kept some of your new images, but not all of them. In the process, I also did a bit of cleanup on the article. I'd like to further discuss the changes you want to make, but due to the extensive work that has already been done on the article and the many factions that get involved, big changes need to be discussed. Montanabw(talk) 20:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm reading up on Cowboy literature to see what may need to be included and also reviewing my old college notes. Rob (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
As a side note, I have long been of the opinion that a separate article on the Vaquero is needed. (See Talk:Vaquero, for my most recent comments on the topic, I haven't gotten around to the sandbox yet) There is more than enough history there for the spinoff, and particularly as there are already articles on the gaucho and the charro, I think it helpful. I would fully support such an article if you wanted to run with the project, and a lot of the material you were adding to cowboy would fit perfectly there. Montanabw(talk) 21:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Help me edit

Hi. Help me with table on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Native_Americans_in_the_United_States&action=history . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiyr (talkcontribs) 22:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Charles B. Pierce edit

Hey Rob. I saw you made a minor edit to Charles B. Pierce. Thanks for adding the link. I'm not sure if you were at all interested in the Pierce article, but it is currently up for GAN, where there is a backlog, so if you'd like to consider doing a review I'd be happy to respond to any comments you might have there. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 18:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Remember Duane Allman.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Remember Duane Allman.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Duane Allman Motorcycle.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Duane Allman Motorcycle.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ma's Roadhouse edit

Hi. I recently made an update to Ma's Roadhouse and found this instance [1] of a copyright violation that you inserted. The text is identical to that on TRUtv's web site promoting this program. Please read our policy on copyvio, and WP:PLAGIARISM, and be sure to rephrase text that you add to Wiki. Thanks. Ed (talk) 23:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

@Robfergusonjr, I have removed the material you copied from the TRUtv website. Please do not copy and paste information from other websites. Also, please take care of these issues when other bring them to your attention. Thanks for your time and consideration. -      Hydroxonium (talk) 02:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Insight.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Insight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Harvie June Van edit

 

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harvie June Van, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hillbilly-music.com/artists/story/index.php?id=13256.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Harvie June Van edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harvie June Van requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Harvie June Van.jpg edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Harvie June Van.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Windwalker (1981 film) edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Windwalker (1981 film), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Windwalker (1980 film). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The problem here is that the history of an article is used for attribution in order to satisfy the license that wikipedia editors edit under; in other words, we need to make it clear who wrote what. When you do a copy and paste into a new article, this becomes difficult to do; if you want to rename/move a page please either use the move button or file a request at wp:RM. Thanks!! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 07:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mississippi civil rights workers' murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Fairlane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Le-roy-de-la-floride.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Le-roy-de-la-floride.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast edit

 
Hello, Robfergusonjr.

You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Orphaned non-free image File:Le Moyne lithograph of Timucua Indians hunting alligators.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Le Moyne lithograph of Timucua Indians hunting alligators.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Robfergusonjr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please claim your upload(s): File:BobFerguson.jpg edit

Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

  Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to Wikimedia Commons. What files are those exactly? See here. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright issue edit

Copyright problem: Native Americans in the American Civil War edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Native Americans in the American Civil War, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Native Americans in the American Civil War saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Pipsally (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply