Welcome!

edit

Hi RebeccaLNelson! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Aviel (August 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi! Happy to rewrite to resolve any issues. I don't quite understand why it's being flagged. Which specific text is a problem? RebeccaLNelson (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I can't tell you exactly what and where the copyvio was, now that the draft has been deleted and I can no longer see it, but from memory, there were several passages in multiple paragraphs that were verbatim copies and/or very close paraphrasing of the source(s). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
OK, thanks for your response. Back to the drawing board, I guess. RebeccaLNelson (talk) 14:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RebeccaLNelson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, RebeccaLNelson. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Sara Aviel, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sara Aviel

edit
 

The article Sara Aviel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. UnTixic (talk) 07:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi UnTixic!
Thanks for flagging - I'd love your help in improving this article. It does include a number of references, of course - are the sources chosen not considered to be reliable enough?
Thanks,
Rebecca RebeccaLNelson (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply