oath

edit

I hereby certify to be Professional, Courteous, & Honest in any work I conduct on Wikipedia &/or any affiliated wiki platforms. The prior certification applies to any &all editing &/or publishing &/or modification of any type on this application platform Wikipedia, the website of Wikipedia, & all wiki affiliated platforms.

The oath is active and valid as it is not subject to material published while logged into any account or logged out and publishing with an ip address.

Although alternative options may exist, it does not change the fact that this account will serve as a literal account of any work I conduct on wiki - although in the past the majority of my time on wiki is spent reading and very rarely did I find myself editing.

The oath will provide a personal standard, to hold up to & it is in no way affiliated with any legal copyright that may or may not exist.

The oath is Published with good will and without mal-intent.

07.30.2021@2355hrs[EST] Real eyes realise (talk) 03:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The oath has been revived and no further amendment is required at this time. 06.24.2020@2342hrs real eyes realise real lies (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

[edit_month/06:07]

The oath has been revived and no further amendment is required at this time. 07.24.2020@2343hrs real eyes realise real lies (talk) 03:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC) real eyes realise real lies (talk) 03:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of films considered the worst have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I'll Follow You Down. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 15:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing. Trivialist (talk) 01:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Assassination, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I apologize and I will make sure to do so in future. I will most likely refrain from ranting and raving as I just did again although it was on a photo that is marked for deletion due to copyright infeodgment. It wast rude or violating of any terms it simply stated she had uploaded a false and misleading photo on the rosacea page it’s the third maybe fourth photo on the page of two female faces (during steroid treatment and after steroid treatment) I did remove the comment from the main page but I don’t have the ability to remove the reply I made on her photo that is marked for deletion due to copyright infringement.

If I edit in the future it will be for real editing purposes so it can help the community.

Once again I apologize and keep up the good work!! real eyes realise real lies (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Grey hair vs Now.png (not reported by me for copyright infringement but by someone else) Corinna Kennedy - user

I just wanted to delete the reply I left in her active discussions that says she uploaded a false and misleading photo of two different people in her rosacea photo.

Problem is She never actually said they are the same person so I managed to delete the original comment I left on the actual rosacea photo ( photo #3 in rosacea page) but cannot delete this reply I left on the one and only discussion in the user CORINNA KENNEDY talk page.


What I can do is promise I won’t do anything like this again as it was completely useless without purpose and IF I edit again it will be for corrective, factual, and relevant purposes.

I apologize if I wasted your time.

The photo is marked for deletion due to copyright infringement anyway so it really doesn’t matter.

Take care real eyes realise real lies (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm HazelAB. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moon landing conspiracy theories have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. HazelAB (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2024 - Attempted Covert Vandalism

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Propylhexedrine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply