Ravenstorm
Today's motto...
→ Who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?
| WikiProject Paintball Category: Paintball Announcements watch · edit · discuss | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| ||||
|
Image:OldGrey-WhiteCat.jpg listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OldGrey-WhiteCat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Knobcreeknightshoot.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Knobcreeknightshoot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 21:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Knobcreeknightshoot.jpg edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiBIBLMenu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:WikiBIBLMenu fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:WikiBIBLMenu, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:PB-familiar edit
Template:PB-familiar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. szyslak 09:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Templates edit
Hi Ravenstorm. You can check out the general template documentation at Help:Template. Those type of templates will also make heavy use of parserfunctios, which are documented at m:ParserFunctions. Hope this helps! If you have any questions, feel free to ask. —METS501 (talk) 03:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK edit
|
On 10 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Knob Creek Gun Range, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Possibly unfree Image:Knobcreeknightshoot.jpg edit
Hi there edit
well i been busy as a new member to the paintball project. i hope my edits are proving helpful. i hope to add some more exotic weapons here for you all and to improve the articles. i made a change to the main project page and i created a Navigation tamplet for the project. {{Paintball}} its a big list but i feel its ready to be inserted into some articles =) tell me what you think and if you want to clean the list up, then feel free to do so. User:Maverick423 If It Looks Good Nuke It 17:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
not a problem =) most of my programming is just copy paste =P, kinda like microsoft lol. anyways i went ahead and requested a basic template outline for a rating scale. this is the best thing about being in so many projects =) User:Maverick423 If It Looks Good Nuke It 13:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
ok using my usal tactics here is what i have so far on that template. User talk:Maverick423/Templet sandbox/second templet im ganna see what i have to do to make those scales come out and stuff
We have Complaints edit
hey man i saw the complaints on the Bushmaster BKO article that it sounded like a ad. i fixed the article but i was reviewing the tipman article and it seems to have the same prob. we should fix it before it gets nominated. User:Maverick423 Im in ur science steeling ur gravity 16:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:Knobcreeknightshoot.jpg, edit
Hi, regarding this image which is listed on WP:PUI Was the quote you mentioned on the image page the exact wording? I can't check it out myself since my (static) IP is blocked from that site. (and I never been to that site before). The way it's stated does not mean the images are released under the GFDL. It also does not specify that the images can be modified. Could you perhaps clarify this? Thanks, Garion96 (talk) 20:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I saw you again uploaded those images, without answering my question. Did the photographer released those images into the public domain? (which is different then releasing it for the public) Or did he spefically stated he released those under the GFDL license? Otherwise the image will be deleted again. Garion96 (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Re:Ghillie suit edit
I was being bold! But then I closed another tab on an article and didn't realize that the ghillie suit one was in the same broweser window and it got all deleted. I had spent 20 minutes and didn't want to do it again. I decided to ask if it should have it's own article first before I spent all that time again. Thanks! Deflagro 01:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello edit
Interesting that I stumbled upon you. I don't use Wikipedia much. Anyway, I saw the image you made, logicalfallacy.gif. I am impressed that you are only 16. (Almost 16, anyway.) Interestingly, I am an evangelical Christian who plays paintball and Counter-Strike. I also do a lot of programming. Same with my younger brother, who is actually your age. He also calls himself a pyromaniac. Are you into apologetics at all? Email me if you like: razzendahcuben [at] gmail [dot] com Razzendahcuben 01:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Spyder Rodeo edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spyder Rodeo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Spyder Rodeo. -- Swerdnaneb 17:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
ION pic edit
I saw that you guys of the WikiProject Paintball group where looking for a picture of an ION, I still got one, and if you need more help with it, I would love to help, maybe my knowledge of speedball and tournements can help. I'm an avid paintballer my self, I participate in the Millenium series and the BPL.
Best regards, Zikking —Preceding comment was added at 21:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Spyder Rodeo edit
A tag has been placed on Spyder Rodeo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. dougweller (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Template:WikiBIBL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
You're invited! edit
Hello, Ravenstorm,
You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.
The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!
(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
0.9 listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 0.9. Since you had some involvement with the 0.9 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 21:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The article NXL has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable league without sufficient depth of coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:50, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
0.9=1 listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 0.9=1. Since you had some involvement with the 0.9=1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
The file File:SpyderMR2.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
The file File:SpyderMR1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
The article NCPA (paintball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Knob Creek Gun Range has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Has a lot of local coverage but no lasting notability. Was briefly featured in a couple of non-notable TV shows
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Bibleshineworld.jpg edit
Thank you for uploading File:Bibleshineworld.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of paintball leagues for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of paintball leagues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article Spyder MR1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability, article appears to be promotional
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Spyder Rodeo for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spyder Rodeo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.