AfC notification: Draft:Mahalakshmi Pavani has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mahalakshmi Pavani. Thanks! Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahalakshmi Pavani (September 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Raghav1788! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahalakshmi Pavani (October 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by I dream of horses was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No changes have been made since the draft was last declined. I guess this means there's no further changes to made.
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Dear @I dream of horses ,
You are probably the third moderator reviewing my article that I wrote months back. The first moderator loosily vetted the article and told me to hold on until the next moderator to review the article. The second moderator based his comments on the first moderator, rather than reviewing the draft or answering my raised queries. Now, you are declined based on the review of the second moderator who is AWOL since I asked him what was wrong and how it can be improved.
I have cited enough sources with aligns well with the notability criteria but here no one is telling me what's missing, many articles are being just passed from one moderator to another. Its been a pattern now. Kind request to look into this Raghav1788 (talk) 06:53, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mahalakshmi Pavani edit

  Hello, Raghav1788. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mahalakshmi Pavani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mahalakshmi Pavani Advocate edit

 

Hello, Raghav1788. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mahalakshmi Pavani Advocate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 00:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply