RAMESH RAJA

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, RAMESH RAJA, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Management seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RoCo^(talk) 15:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RAMESH RAJA/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello! RAMESH RAJA, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Friendship has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Friendship was changed by RAMESH RAJA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867786 on 2017-01-21T03:30:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Making Money. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Good and evil. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Good and evil.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Good and evil was changed by RAMESH RAJA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891561 on 2017-01-21T08:37:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RAMESH RAJA (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

In ancient times the king, monarch, dictators are the most wealthy and powerful persons of the nation but after scientific revolution and democracy it had changed. There are 8 billions human being living in this world right now including you and me. All human beings and all living beings in this world are dying after a certain old age. So to define a most powerful human being who has to die after a certain old age means how he can hire more human being at a time for his own personal work and how much property he has or he can purchase right now or he have means his maximum strength than other human being thus the most wealthy man in this world is the most powerful person in this world. At present robots are very costly with certain limitations but in future there is maximum possibility of all human military in this world to be replaced by robots more advanced and more useful and more cheap than a human soldier as science and technology is developing fastly so the main thing depends upon development of science and technology as almost all human being physical work job are fastly replaced by machines just depends upon the cost of machine or labour which is less if by machines then it is less then that job is occupied by a machine it is happening automatic. If all human soldiers are replaced by robots in future then the whole miliitary be controlled via sattellite and then the prime minister,home minister, president had to be completely depend upon science and technology and engineers and scientist. Then the country or person which is most advanced in science and technology and uses it means he is powerful or rich. For example at present Bill Gates is the richest person in this world who completely depends on science and technology with numerous http://engineers.So at present Bill gates who is the most richest person in the world is the most powerful person in the world.

Your draft article, User:RAMESH RAJA/sandbox

Hello, RAMESH RAJA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)