To start a new conversation please click here.


It seems easier to me if we conduct conversations on one page only. If you leave me a message on this page, I will answer here. If I have left a message on your talk page, would you please answer it there. It gets confusing, bouncing back and forth to see who said what. If I don't notice your reply on your page, please leave me a note here to let me know. Thank you for helping keep things simple.

Your medcabal case edit

Please provide me links to the edits you are talking about. WikieZach| talk 11:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Wikiezach. Thanks for your interest. It is the fourth paragraph here.  Sean Lotz  talk  18:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Imaninjapirate reverts my revert, and winds up with odd English edit

Thank you for experimenting with the page Tea on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Imaninjapiratetalk to me 02:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I beg your pardon? I am confused how my reverting of an ungrammatical change counts as a "test." And I am confused how it is better to revert my revert, which produced normal English usage and grammar. The proper form is "drunk," not "drank." If you can show me how "drank" is better, I will let it stay, but otherwise, I'm going to change it back.  Sean Lotz  talk  03:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
P.S. I'm just changing it back now, since it was not a test, not vandalism, but a fix. My change was correct. When you use VandalProof, aren't you supposed to check before you approve the change?
Hmmm, maybe that sounds snippy. Sorry if it does, but I'll let it stand.  Sean Lotz  talk  04:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh I'm sorry. I didn't read closely enough and I thought you were just changing words to drunk (as in intoxicated). I will be sure to read more carefully from now on. Thanks for letting me know. :-) Imaninjapiratetalk to me 04:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WelcomeBot edit

I noticed you welcome noobs. I am doing research in prep for the welcomebot trail in order to establish some facts on new user trends. Please can you have a look at Category:WelcomeBotResearch. I would appreciate your involvement. Also so as to assist, please can you sub your welcome template with {{welcome123}} which includes that category. Thanks. frummer 02:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

no prob at all! keep up the good work! frummer 03:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
by the way, please put your name down on the research page. ta! frummer 03:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh, yeah. I forgot.  Sean Lotz  talk  03:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the input Sean. georgewstanton Bold text

Welcome to VandalProof! edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Queezbo! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 19:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Lir
Fodla
Advent
Confession
Ascension
Autocephaly
Deacon
Helvetia
Living Church
Banba
Oriental Orthodoxy
Duke of Zhou
Tailtiu
Galatian language
Jael
Ogmios
Truro
East Tyrol
Tuireann
Cleanup
Celtic nations
Breton people
St Ives, Cornwall
Merge
Pan-Celticism
Neo-evangelicalism
Celtic polytheism
Add Sources
Chinese tea culture
Olwen
Pentecost
Wikify
Riot/Clone
Names and titles of Jesus in the New Testament
Common grace
Expand
Kinsey scale
Sammamish, Washington
Hair coloring

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest edit

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Queezbo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Queezbo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Sean Lotz talk 02:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address, so we can't investigate your claim. You can find your IP address using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Queezbo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Queezbo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply