Hello, Pxtreme75! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Symbian

edit

Hello Pxtreme75. The problem with multiple top-level Symbian articles is that it confuses Wikipedia readers. There's no start point to get all Symbian information. We need a single start article, that encompasses everything Symbian. Maybe the answer is to create one at Symbian, which currently redirects to a disambiguation page. This article would describe the latest OS. It would have a 1 or 2 paragraph History section, with a link to a main history article at 'Symbian History' (which describes the older OS versions in more detail). What do you think?--Lester 21:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello Lester. First of all thanks for taking the time to comment on my talk page. I still believe that it is a change of era for Symbian, the same way for example we do not have a single article for the Roman and the Byzantine empire (although their distinction was not clear at the beginning). However, as a second though perhaps it is too early for Symbian to make this distinction. There are a lot of comments already on the discussion that share your opinion and what you suggest certainly makes sense. So, no more objections from me on this... Pxtreme75 (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Hey Lester - I've read your comments on the Refinery CMS article and added more independent sources.

Deletion review for I-DEAS

edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of I-DEAS. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Karnesky (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The AfD has been relisted. You may wish to comment, based on my revised version of the article. --Karnesky (talk) 00:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talentlms, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SAAS, Stripe and Dropbox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of TalentLMS for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TalentLMS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TalentLMS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply