Your submission at Articles for creation: A HACKING VIACOM (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Priyanka Gupta Sharma! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. You have done this twice now, at Barbara Poppe and Binod (meme). If you wish to nominate an article for deletion, please see the deletion policy. Moving an article into draft space right before nominating for deletion can be seen as an attempt to circumvent policy.KuyaBriBriTalk 22:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Priyanka Gupta Sharma! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:47, Monday, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ankit Fadia, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trishneet Arora, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sonia Grey, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ankit Fadia. Dl2000 (talk) 00:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Waqar Zaka, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 15:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply