Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Prinz16gaga. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Carolin von Petzholdt, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Please do not edit this page if you are connected to the article subject. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop editing your own Wikipedia page.

edit

Wikipedia is not a promotional platform. As you admit who you are in the image upload for the Carolin von Petzholdt article, you have a very clear conflict of interest. Please leave the article alone and suggest changes via the talk page. ALso, you may not be aware of it, but editing your own Wikiepdia page can do more harm than good. There are many examples of news media articles about the subject editing their own Wikipedia page! Imagine you later become really famous... This warning in itself becomes a part of the permanent record of the page. If you persist in editing your own article, you can be blocked from editing. Have a nice day! HappyValleyEditor (talk) 08:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Carolin von Petzholdt for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carolin von Petzholdt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolin von Petzholdt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 06:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Boom Boom Girls Of Wrestling (April 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Boom Boom Girls Of Wrestling

edit
 

Hello, Prinz16gaga. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Boom Boom Girls Of Wrestling".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Carolin von Petzholdt

edit

  Hello, Prinz16gaga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carolin von Petzholdt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Carolin von Petzholdt

edit
 

Hello, Prinz16gaga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carolin von Petzholdt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply