Welcome

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PremierePrush (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here A lot of people work on our one IP, and some others helped. I did not encourage anything like this, and I can assure you that we are not connected in a way that would exemplify sockpuppeting. PremierePrush (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

From the technical evidence, it looks like sock puppetry not meat puppetry, however either way, you should remain blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, PremierePrush, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your user page

edit

Hello! I noticed that you recently submitted an article for review at User:PremierePrush/sandbox/PremierPrush. However, the article appeared to be an attempt to create a user page for yourself and not an encyclopedic article. As such, I have moved the page to the correct location for your main user page at User:PremierePrush. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to leave me a message on my user talk page. Thanks, Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ram Ray—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Ram L. Ray

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ram L. Ray you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KrishnaKant Bhai -- KrishnaKant Bhai (talk) 21:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Ram L. Ray

edit

The article Ram L. Ray you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Ram L. Ray for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KrishnaKant Bhai -- KrishnaKant Bhai (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PremierePrush. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ram Ray (associate professor) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Ray (associate professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Ray (associate professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply