Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Pilargumaclaramunt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Pilargumaclaramunt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Pilargumaclaramunt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Linear depolarization ratio edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Linear depolarization ratio, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.termwiki.com/EN:linear_depolarization_ratio_(LDR).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox edit

Hi,

I have recategorized more precisely the pictures about millimeter cloud radars that you have downloaded. I was curious to know what they would be used for and that lead me to your sanbox. The article you have begun is of great interest for me as I am a meteorologist involved with operational radars. Let me know when you convert your sandbox into a real article, I would like to translate it in French, my language.

Keep the good work,

Pierre cb (talk) 03:15, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have read the modified article and I have a comment: the sections "The Doppler spectra" and "I-Q@ processing" should be transferred to "Pulse-Doppler signal processing" as it applies to all such radars. That way you could leave an introduction of the main thing important to the millimeter radar in the article and put a {{Main|Pulse-Doppler signal processing#The Doppler spectra{{!}}The Doppler spectra}} at the beginning of the section. If you are not familiar with the procedure, just let me know and I can do it for you. Pierre cb (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Pilargumaclaramunt/sandbox edit

 

Hello, Pilargumaclaramunt. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply