User talk:PeaceNT/Archive 13
This is an archive of past discussions about User:PeaceNT. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 42 | 15 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Request username (similar too)
Could you ok my request for the username "Phantoms". The create account said it was too similar to phantom5, and a couple users then posted that it's too similar to Phantom who is not very active. I have an active account request at Wikipedia:Request_an_account#Phantoms. Thank you very much. --71.229.35.119 03:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Help!
Should this be deleted? @pple complain 17:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it does: WP:NOT#USER. BTW, please add a link to your talk page, plz. @pple complain 17:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed link already. As long as user posts st like blog prose, whatever on user page or talk page, I think it's the same since they both belong to userspace. @pple complain 17:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
It's been a while...
Zeibura has smiled at you! A smile is a curve which straightens most things, and hopefully this one has straightened your day somewhat. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Have a nice day, - Zeibura (Talk) 15:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fairy1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Fairy1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fairy2.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Fairy2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
NASCAR Fan24's Secret Page!
The Secret Page Detective Award | ||
This user has found NASCAR Fan24's secret page! Congratulations! |
Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 43 | 22 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Request for review
- The Yellow Bird's diary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
Listed Hi, English Wikipedian. I'm a Vietnamese Wikipedian, my page can be found here vi:Thành_Viên:Magnifier. Today I look for a article in Wikipedia , the article The Yellow Bird's diary but i found out it was deleted; but i'm not satisfied for the reason "it's a NPOV failure", so i'm make a request here. I, Magnifier, request the article The Yellow Bird's diary must be restored beacause the following reasons:
- Famous:
- because it's a NATIONAL TV show, mostly all Vietnames who often watch Vietname National Television (VTV) will be know it clearly. You may check for the keyword "Nhật Ký Vàng Anh"; "Nhat Ky Vang Anh", "Vang Anh", "Thuy Linh" AT Vietnamese Google Engine www.google.com.vn and get the Google Hits in Vietnamese for that TV program.
- Addtional, The sex scandal of the main artress "Hoang Thuy Linh" and her lover "Vu Hoang Viet" make it more and more famously! And currently it is still hot in Vietnam You may check here ; [1].
- Even BBC Vietnamese, although outside Vietnam and often report about politican news in Vietnam, it's have more than 4 articles about "Nhat Ky Vang Anh" or The Yellow Bird's diary:
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/vietnamese/vietnam/story/2007/10/071025_vanganh_arrests.shtml
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/vietnamese/entertainment/story/2007/10/071024_celebvanganh.shtml
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/vietnamese/vietnam/story/2007/10/071017_vang_anh_saga.shtml
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/vietnamese/vietnam/story/2007/10/071028_vanganh_update.shtml
- Notability: It have full reason to have a place in Wikipedia:
- It's a Vienamized Version TV program of pt:O Diário de Sofia, why O Diário de Sofia can have a article in Wikipedia but The Yellow Bird's diary can't ??? It's too unfair
- NPOV:
- Yes, may be only write about the Show's Scandal ( The Sex Scandal ) is writen in the article. But you can place a NOPV template and STUB template ( it lack informations not lack the reason to live) but don't USING IT as a REASON to DELETE the article! "it's a NPOV failure" is a total Westerner's (if you are in the Euro, or American, we Vietnamese call all Europeans and Americans "Westerner") POV, you don't have a BIT information about the show in VIETNAM or try to expand it, so don't judge it easily.
If i made any msitaken in English, i'm sorry because i'm only level 2 in English . Wait for yor reply at my User talk page here.
So thank for reading.
Good luck to you. Magnifier 03:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Happy Halloween!
As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish my twenty favorite fellow Wikipedians a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 04:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 44 | 29 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Preity Zinta FA
Hi there. The Preity Zinta article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
RfA/AfD
Thanks mate. Hesperian 11:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you bunches!
Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with you! (Esprit15d 21:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)) |
Thank you for your support.
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).
31 hours?!?
Did you look closely at the contribs for 129.44.133.226? If so, how did you come up with only 31 hours? I figured with all the warnings on their talk page, and the complete lack of constructive edits in their contrib list that the block would be MUCH lengthier. What was your reasoning in settling on 31 hours? K. Scott Bailey 15:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's cool. I was just confused about how you came up with the number. Thanks for your reply. K. Scott Bailey 15:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Dearest peaceNT,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your kind words of support are very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to The_undertow and Phoenix-wiki for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)