Welcome!

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 10:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

No worries!

edit

Hope you enjoy it here, G'day from Australia! Phgao 11:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Fabian Akerstrom

edit

A tag has been placed on Fabian Akerstrom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. David Eppstein (talk) 05:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fabian Akerstrom

edit

Actually, I was quite aware of the tag, but there was no justification given for the hang on. If there were content available to establish notability, you could have added a quick note on the talk page saying "content to be added with the next X minutes." It is odd as well that an article was created in the mainspace without any sources, assertion of notability or the like. That is why it was deleted. If you wish to re-create the page with content establishing notability based on reliable sources, then it will not be deleted (at least not speedily). Thank you. Cheers, CP 06:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem, hope there's no hard feelings. It's just difficult for an admin to tell the difference between legit and notable pages sometimes without the notability assertion (we get dozens every few minutes, it's ridiculous). Cheers, CP 06:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Page protection

edit

Hello Pchackola, please add new page protection request directly below the Current requests for protection headline, otherwise your request could likely be missed. Thanks --Oxymoron83 10:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Viktor Hedman

edit

In the future, you can just do a page move rather than recreating the article with the correct title. Saves you a little bit of time. Tijuana Brass (talk) 07:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Glad to help! Tijuana Brass (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
By the way... you're Indian, you like country, you're Catholic and you're into hockey? I think you may be the most diverse person to ever have existed. Tijuana Brass (talk) 08:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Victor Hedman

edit
 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Victor Hedman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Victor Hedman

edit
 

An editor has nominated Victor Hedman, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Hedman and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Janruary 2008

edit

Sorry about the "vandalism", i thought that i was undoing it, but was a bit behind the game. i will check next time. thanks for the warning anyway. Ashe613 (talk) 10:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your VandalProof Application

edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Pchackola. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 16:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to VandalProof!

edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Polluxian! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrbtalk 15:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:BharathamathaPLKD.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BharathamathaPLKD.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia: WikiProject Swimming

edit

Hi there, Ive recently joined the WP:WikiProject Swimming team. Im committed to getting on top of the project. Since you have listed yourself as a participant i thought i'd let you know what i've done. Ive got a bot thats going through the relevant catagouries that apply to the project and tagging them with our banner. Ive done all the stub class articles and assessed them automaticlly, and im starting on the 3000 other articles that ive identified. So this will mean that we will have all the articles in the scope of the project together and we can start working on them. So if you have any spare time theres going to be thousands of articles that will need assessing. There are around 2000 articles Just in Stub-Class swimming articles, and most of these will need the importance assessed. I think it's important we get all this assessing done, so we can start working on the articles.

Don't fell pressured to start assessing articles, i just thought that since theres going to be so many articles, you should know that theres heaps of work that needs to be done, ill be trying my best once my exams are finished. Remember many hands make light work.

Cheers Printer222 (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:40 New pages

edit

Great! Here are your barnstars!

  The Articles for Creation Barnstar
For your great contributions to the Articles for Creation as per this challenge, I, Thisisborin9, hereby award you this barnstar. Great job! Cheers, Thisisborin9sign here! 17:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless work and dedication to Wikipedia and making it a better project (by creating valuable new pages, that is), I, Thisisborin9, hereby award you this "Tireless Contributor Barnstar." Great job! Cheers, Thisisborin9sign here! 17:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cheers, Thisisborin9sign here! 17:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pier Gerlofs Donia

edit

Did you know (DYK) about Greate Pier? Last king of Frisia (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your request for rollback

edit
 

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! —αἰτίας discussion 15:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Casualties of the Iraq War

edit

Why have you reverted me, I don't understand I have not vandalised anything, I updated the numbers of casualties among Iraqi security forces based on the Wikipedia article List of Iraqi security forces fatality reports in Iraq and I provided a link to that article so people would see from where the numbers are coming from. And everything is well referenced in that article. There is no vandalism. This way has already been used in the main article of the Iraq war where the numbers of insurgents and security forces killed were entered in the infobox and links to Wikipedia articles that list those deaths had been provided as a source. Again, why have you reverted me?89.216.236.45 (talk) 13:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiBirthday

edit
 

I saw from here that it's been exactly four years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

And the same from me. Enjoy your day! – Quadell (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I appologize for the misunderstanding. I just thought that since the other Juventus players do not have it listed, it shouldn't be listed either. But I'm fine with it. Thanks for checking. --Dathangy (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I am currently working on the "Swedish Project" and "Award and Prizes"'s article Nobel Prize. Since it is a top importance article and not even GA class I am trying to make it a GA article and perhaps further after that. However, I'm in a state now where I could use some help. I need a new pair (several pairs in fact) of eyes to look at the article and the talk page for improving prose, debation of different things and some sourcing. Do you got any possibility to help out? BR --Esuzu 12:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esuzu (talkcontribs)

Proposed deletion of Fabian Åkerström

edit
 

The article Fabian Åkerström has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article makes no claim of notability for this table tennis player.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolovis (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marco Belotti

edit
 

The article Marco Belotti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article contains no claim of notability for this freestyle swimmer.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolovis (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

edit

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

edit
 

Hi Polluxian,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Thanks

edit

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, thanks for your editorial contribution

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Infobox table tennis player has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GoPTCN 14:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Some falafel for you!

edit
  Thank you for your tireless work, particularly with sports articles! Cheers and enjoy your falafel. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)

edit

Hi. I was wondering if you would be interested in contributing articles to Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)? It needs contributors to increase diversity of content from different countries and bring about large scale improvements. The idea at some point will be to host a National Contest related to your country of interest. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Polluxian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Polluxian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

FAR notice - First Nagorno-Karabakh War

edit

I have nominated First Nagorno-Karabakh War for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list

edit

Hi Polluxian! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Jessica Hardy

edit

Jessica Hardy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steve DaSilva for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve DaSilva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve DaSilva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Klinetalkcontribs 13:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Despotovic

edit
 

The article Daniel Despotovic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero references. Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. gobonobo + c 23:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply